What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 7 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Electrical Work / Electrical Permit summonses; 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Elevator / Vertical Transportation; Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment; Façade / Exterior Wall. The hearing date is October 20, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 10, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39199849N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: CLASS 1 C/U: 1. ROPE GRIPPER DISABLED BY A SET SCREW, PREVENTING PROPER EMERGENCY FUNCTION. AS PER ASME A17.1 2.19. REMEDY FOR CLASS 1: CORRECT ALL CONDITIONS. LOAD TEST REQUIRED TO LIFT THE C/U ORDER. REINSPEC
Cited provision(s): 151 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE COMPLIANT MANNER: SERVICE EQUIPME
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39199902N
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED IN THE ROOM MECHANICAL ROOM A WATER HEATER WAS INSTALLED BEHIND ANOTHER AND BOXED IN WITH NO ROOM OR ACCESS FOR REPAIR/REPLACEMENT/SERVICE. ALSO PVC ON BOILER EXHAUST. CONTRARY TO MC 306 - ACCESS
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
- Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
- Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
- Inspection and testing results
- Device-status or annual filing records
- Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39199878M
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE -COMPLIANT MANNER. ATOI I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE#4 THE WALL FACADE IS IN DISREPAIR FROM THE GROUND LEVEL UP TO THIS 4TH FLOOR LEVEL, LOOSE BRICK WITH MISSING MORTAR AN THE CHI
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39199900J
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE/MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT ACCESS/WORK SPACE ABOUT ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. OBSERVED IN THE BASEMENT IN THE ATS RM EXCESSIVE STORAGE OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LADDERS, BUCKETS, T
Cited provision(s): 2D3 — EC 110.26 FAILURE TO PROVIDE/MAINTAIN ACCESS/WORK SPACE ABOUT ELEC. EQUIP
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199903P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THROUGH OUT STAIRCASE B ON THE FIRE SPRINKLER HOSE CONNECTION HAS THE USE OF PLASTIC CAPS ALL CAPS MUST BE METAL NO PLASTIC, REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39199901L
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES OR WIRING IN USE. OBSERVED IN STAIRWAY B THE SMOKE PURGE IS HANGING FROM CEILING THE LOUVERS ARE BROKEN NEEDS TO BE I
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199904R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 10, 2026; hearing October 20, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED THROUGH OUT THE BUILDING OBSTRUCTED SPRINKLER HEADS AND MISSING SPRINKLER CAPS ALL SPRINKLER HEADS MUST BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIONS CONTRARY TO BC 903.3 - INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMATIC SPRIN
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 7 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review