What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses; Plumbing / Gas; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit. The hearing dates are October 26, 2026, October 27, 2026, October 29, 2026; the source issue date(s) are March 22, 2019, May 7, 2019, September 14, 2019.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Plumbing / Gas — Summons 35452329K
CLASS - 1 · Issued September 14, 2019; hearing October 26, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: REISSUE ECB #35401819J ISSUED 03-22-19 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER OBSERVED IN CELLAR A UNION FITTING INSTALLED ON A GAS PIPING LINE AND NOT BEING USED CONST A GAS SUPPLY PIPE TOA G
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Plumbing/gas matters typically require determining whether the work was permitted and performed by the required licensed trade, correcting unsafe or unapproved conditions, and completing inspections/sign-off.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there a valid plumbing/gas filing covering the cited scope?
- Did the condition predate the respondent's work or ownership?
- Was the cited installation already disconnected or corrected?
Evidence that may matter
- Licensed Master Plumber permit / filing records
- Pressure-test / inspection / utility records
- Invoices and plumber statements
- Photographs showing the installation and correction
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35402382Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued March 22, 2019; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE GROUND FAULT CIRUIT INTERRUPTER PROTECTION AS REQURIED (GFCI) I OBSERVED IN THE BATHROOMS RECEPTACLE OUTLETS THAT ARE NO GFCI PROTECTED. REMEDY: INSTALL GFCI PROTECTION.
Cited provision(s): 2D5 — EC 210.8 FAIL TO INSTALL GROUND-FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER (GFCI) PROTECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 35402383X
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 22, 2019; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNSAFE UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN USE. I OBSERVED ON EVERY FLOOR INCLUDING THE CELLAR OPEN ELECTRICAL BOXES AND HANGING LIGHT FIXTURES.THE OPEN ELECTRICAL BOXES AND HANGING LIGHT FIXTURES ARE
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 35402384H
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 22, 2019; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: 400.8 FLEXIBLE EXTENSION CORDS USED AS A PERMANENT WIRING METHOD. I OBSERVED THROUGHOUT THE HOUSE ON EVERY FLOOR THE USE OF FLEXIBLE EXTENSION CORDS AS A PERMANENT WIRING METHOD GOING THROUGH DOORWAYS RAN
Cited provision(s): 1D1 — EC-MISC MICELLANEOUS VIOLATION OF ELECTRICAL CODE TECHNICAL STANDARDS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39002676M
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 7, 2019; hearing October 29, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO COMPLY, COMPLY WITH COMMISSIONER'S ORDER; COMPLY WITH CODE
Cited provision(s): 187 — 28-201.1 UNLAWFUL ACTS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review