BuildingViolation.com

October 2026 NYC DOB / OATH Hearing — BIN 4224656

Queens property record with 5 OATH/ECB summons records in the supplied October 2026 hearing extract. Hearing date: October 27, 2026.

Need representation for this October hearing?

We can review the summons, agency record, correction status and available evidence; define the hearing strategy; prepare the authorized submission or appearance; and coordinate the underlying violation-resolution work separately where needed. Because hearing deadlines are fixed, substantive work begins after scope, authorization and payment.

Property / Hearing Identifiers

Primary hearing issue: Work Without a Permit

BoroughQueens
BIN4224656
Block / Lot10547 / 0022
October Records5
Official violation location: Loading from NYC OATH public records…
Address is resolved from the OATH Hearings Division Case Status record for OATH ticket 039192234P (source ECB number 39192234P). BIN and block/lot remain shown below for verification.

October 2026 Hearing Records

OATH/ECB #HearingSeverityHearing statusBalanceAlleged conditionCode / section
39192234P
ACTIVE
October 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 PENDING $2,500.00 NOTED; AT CELLAR LEVEL INSTALLED GAS LINE FOR STOVE WITHOUT OBTAINING REQUIRED PERMITS, OBTAIN PERMIT 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
39192235R
ACTIVE
October 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $1,250.00 NOTED; AT CELLAR LEVEL INSTALLED ELECTRICAL WIRING FOR HVAC SPLIT UNIT WITHOUT OBTAINING REQUIRED PERMITS., OBTAIN ALL PERMITS 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
39192236Z
ACTIVE
October 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $1,250.00 NOTED; AT CELLAR LEVEL INSTALLED WATER & WASTE LINES FOR 3 PC BATH (TOILET, SINK, STALL SHOWER) AND RESIDENTIAL SINK WITHOUT OBTAINING REQ PERMITS, OBTAIN ALL PERMITS 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
39192237K
ACTIVE
October 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 PENDING $1,250.00 NOTED; AT EXP.3 OF PREMISES STEPS LEADING TO CELLAR MISSING/ NO HANDRAILS FOR 5 STEPS. CREATING A FALL HAZARD. AS PER 28-301.1, REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
39192238M
ACTIVE
October 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 PENDING $2,500.00 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED IN THE BOILER ROOM NO FIRE-RATING; WITH MISSING WALL COVERING AND OPEN CEILING EXPOSING THE FLOOR JOIST OF THE 1ST FLOOR. DOOR TO BOILER ROOM HAS 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER

What DOB is alleging at this property

This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 3 Work Without a Permit summonses; Failure to Maintain; Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment. The hearing date is October 27, 2026; the source issue date(s) are June 11, 2026.

Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.

Work Without a Permit — Summons 39192234P

CLASS - 1 · Issued June 11, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED; AT CELLAR LEVEL INSTALLED GAS LINE FOR STOVE WITHOUT OBTAINING REQUIRED PERMITS, OBTAIN PERMIT

Cited provision(s): 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
  • Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
  • Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
  • If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?

Evidence that may matter

  • Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
  • Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
  • Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
  • Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
  • Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized

Work Without a Permit — Summons 39192235R

CLASS - 2 · Issued June 11, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED; AT CELLAR LEVEL INSTALLED ELECTRICAL WIRING FOR HVAC SPLIT UNIT WITHOUT OBTAINING REQUIRED PERMITS., OBTAIN ALL PERMITS

Cited provision(s): 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
  • Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
  • Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
  • If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?

Evidence that may matter

  • Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
  • Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
  • Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
  • Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
  • Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized

Work Without a Permit — Summons 39192236Z

CLASS - 2 · Issued June 11, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED; AT CELLAR LEVEL INSTALLED WATER & WASTE LINES FOR 3 PC BATH (TOILET, SINK, STALL SHOWER) AND RESIDENTIAL SINK WITHOUT OBTAINING REQ PERMITS, OBTAIN ALL PERMITS

Cited provision(s): 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

How this type of condition is typically resolved

The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
  • Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
  • Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
  • If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?

Evidence that may matter

  • Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
  • Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
  • Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
  • Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
  • Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized

Failure to Maintain — Summons 39192237K

CLASS - 2 · Issued June 11, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: NOTED; AT EXP.3 OF PREMISES STEPS LEADING TO CELLAR MISSING/ NO HANDRAILS FOR 5 STEPS. CREATING A FALL HAZARD. AS PER 28-301.1, REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE

Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER

How this type of condition is typically resolved

Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
  • Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
  • Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?

Evidence that may matter

  • Dated before/after photographs
  • Repair invoices and contractor statements
  • Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
  • Maintenance logs and prior inspection records

Boiler / HVAC / Service Equipment — Summons 39192238M

CLASS - 1 · Issued June 11, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING

DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. OBSERVED IN THE BOILER ROOM NO FIRE-RATING; WITH MISSING WALL COVERING AND OPEN CEILING EXPOSING THE FLOOR JOIST OF THE 1ST FLOOR. DOOR TO BOILER ROOM HAS

Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER

How this type of condition is typically resolved

Service-equipment charges usually require repair, safe shutdown or replacement of the cited equipment, together with any required inspection, testing, annual filing or device-status update.

Hearing issues to verify

  • Was the cited device in service at the time alleged?
  • Was the equipment already repaired, disconnected or removed?
  • Do required annual inspection / filing records show compliance for the relevant cycle?

Evidence that may matter

  • Licensed contractor maintenance/repair records
  • Inspection and testing results
  • Device-status or annual filing records
  • Utility/CO testing records and photographs where relevant

Case-specific next step

For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.

Submit These Summonses for Review

What to do before the hearing

1. Verify the summons

Confirm the scheduled date, respondent, violation location, charges and current OATH status.

2. Preserve evidence

Gather permits, photographs, contracts, inspection records, professional letters and proof of correction that actually relate to the cited condition.

3. Separate hearing from correction

A hearing result and physical/agency correction are not always the same task. Plan both tracks where required.

Official Hearing Record

Verify the current hearing status and violation location in the NYC OATH Hearings Division Case Status data before relying on any public directory.

NYC OATH Case Status Data →

OATH evidence and DOB correction records

OATH advises respondents to bring or submit the evidence needed to prove their case, including legal or official records, photographs, documents and witnesses. For a DOB Certificate of Correction, DOB may require supporting material such as photographs, receipts, permits and inspection results in addition to the required correction information and applicable civil-penalty documentation.