What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Stop Work Order summonses; Failure to Maintain. The hearing dates are October 13, 2026, October 27, 2026, October 6, 2026; the source issue date(s) are May 29, 2026, May 6, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39187548L
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 6, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED AT REAR/ BACKYARD AREA OF PREMISES, GARBAGE AND COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, OLD WINDOWS WITH FRAMING LEFT IN DISARRAY. NOTE: 2ND FL WINDOW OPENING (WITHOUT GLASS AND FRAMING) EXPOSED TO THE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Stop Work Order — Summons 39187547J
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 6, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, OBSERVED AT PREMISES, REMOVAL OF STOP WORK ORDER ISSUED ON 02/20/2024 UNDER # V 022024C24-00397. SWO IS NOT IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE OR FOR PUBLIC VIEWING ANYWHERE ON THE PROPERTY. SWO MUST STAY POSTED UNTI
Cited provision(s): 1F8 — 28-207.2.5 TAMPERED WITH, REMOVED OR DEFACED A WRITTEN STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Stop Work Order — Summons 39190393N
CLASS - 1 · Issued May 29, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: WORK CONTRARY TO SWO: ATOI OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION WORK HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WHILE PROPERTY UNDER PSWO ISSUED ON 06/04/2024 FOR WW/OP. FRAMING WORK, NEW JOISTS, BEAM SISTERING & FLOORING REPLACEMENT THRO
Cited provision(s): 112 — 28-207.2.2 UNLAWFULLY CONTINUED WORK WHILE NOTICE OF A STOP WORK ORDER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
An active Stop Work Order has to be treated separately from the underlying summons. The cited unsafe or unpermitted condition must be corrected or legalized, required permits/penalties addressed, and the issuing agency must formally rescind or modify the order before prohibited work resumes.
Hearing issues to verify
- What exact work was covered by the Stop Work Order: all work or only part of the project?
- Was the activity observed after the order actually prohibited work, or was it authorized safety / emergency / corrective work?
- Was the Stop Work Order already rescinded or modified before the activity alleged in the summons?
Evidence that may matter
- Copy of the Stop Work Order and any rescission/modification notice
- DOB permit records and inspector correspondence
- Daily logs, photographs and contractor records showing when work stopped or resumed
- Evidence identifying any limited corrective/safety work performed
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review