What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 5 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Work Without a Permit; Failure to Maintain; Façade / Exterior Wall; Other Building / Code Compliance; Zoning / Parking / Use. The hearing dates are October 13, 2026, October 6, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 30, 2026, May 1, 2026, May 4, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39198543X
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 30, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE JOB PERMIT # Q01145725-I1-GC EXPIRES 01/01/2027 ARE NOT POSTED AT PREMISES., POST/PROPERLY POST PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 220 — §28-105.11 FAILURE TO POST PERMIT FOR WORK AT PREMISES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39186839R
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 1, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED AT EXTERIOR THE GUTTER & PORTIONS OF SIDING AT EXPO.2 DETERIORATED. TRASH BAGS, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS & DRUM TANKS STORED IN REAR YARD. VIOLATION ISSUED., REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Façade / Exterior Wall — Summons 39186955Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 1, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED AT EXPO.2 AN APPROX. 9 FT. SECTION OF GUTTER HANGING OFF THE BUILDING AT THE SECOND-FLOOR ROOF LEVEL; DETERIORATED PIECES OF SIDING ALSO OBSERVED. VIOLATION ISSUED., MAINTAIN EXTERIOR BUILDING WAL
Cited provision(s): 204 — 28-302.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG WALL(S) OR APPURTENANCES
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Exterior-wall charges usually require a competent inspection of the cited façade/appurtenance, repair of unsafe or deteriorated conditions, and—when the building is subject to FISP—the appropriate QEWI report or amended filing.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the inspector's description match the actual exposure, floor and defect?
- Was the condition already repaired or protected before the summons date?
- Was there a current FISP/QEWI filing addressing the same condition?
Evidence that may matter
- QEWI report, FISP filing or amended report
- Close-up and elevation photographs identifying the exact defect
- Repair proposals, invoices and completion records
- Engineer/architect letter and inspection documentation
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39186956X
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 1, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI OBSERVED NINE 55-GALLON DRUMS AND APPROXIMATELY TWENTY GARBAGE BAGS, ALONG WITH MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS, STORED IN REAR YARD. VIOLATION ISSUED., MAINTAIN ADEQUATE CONSTRUCTION HOUSEKEEPING
Cited provision(s): 212 — BC 3303.4,27-1018 FAIL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HSEKEEPING PER SECTIONS REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39187009M
CLASS - 2 · Issued May 4, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATOI, ECB VIOLATION ISSUED FOR PARKING REGULATIONS IN A RESIDENTIAL R4 DISTRICT, A BLACK 1500 RAM QUAD CAB TRUCK VEHICLE AT EXPOSURE #2 PARKED WITH NO LICENSE PLATE'S OR REGISTRATION A VIOLATION OF ZR-25.41., C
Cited provision(s): 283 — ZR 25-41 VIOLATION OF PARKING REGULATIONS IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 5 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review