What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Failure to Maintain summonses; Fence / Height / Zoning. The hearing date is October 27, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 19, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201022P
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER NOTED: A GUTTER DOWNSPOUT LOCATED AT THE FRONT RIGHT SIDE (EXPO 4) OF THE PREMISES WAS OBSERVED TO BE INSTALLED AND ATTACHED TO THE NEIGHBORING BUILDING.
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39201023R
CLASS - 2 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN A CODE COMPLIANT MANNER NOTED: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, MISSING SHINGLES/ROOFING WERE OBSERVED AT THE FRONT RIGHT PORTION OF THE ROOF, EXPOSING THE UNDERLYING ROOFING MATERIALS
Cited provision(s): 202 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Fence / Height / Zoning — Summons 39201024Z
CLASS - 3 · Issued August 19, 2026; hearing October 27, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PERMITTED FENCE HEIGHT. AT TIME OF INSPECTION ENTIRE FRONT AND SIDE OF PREMISES (AREAS FACING 230 PL AND S. CONDUIT) ERECTED METAL FENCE APPROX. 5 FT HIGH. FENCE EXCEEDING THE LEGAL PERMI
Cited provision(s): 307 — 27-509,BC 3111.1 FENCE EXCEEDS PERMITTED HEIGHT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path depends on fence height, location, zoning and property type. The owner may need to reduce/remove the fence or document that it complies with the applicable permitted height/setback requirements.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the height measured from the correct grade and at the cited location?
- Do zoning or approved plans allow the fence as installed?
- Was the cited fence temporary construction fencing rather than a permanent zoning fence?
Evidence that may matter
- Survey and field measurements
- Zoning map / approved plans
- Photographs showing height and location
- Permit or prior approval if applicable
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review