What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Other Building / Code Compliance; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Elevator / Vertical Transportation. The hearing date is October 13, 2026; the source issue date(s) are April 2, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39183048R
CLASS - 1 · Issued April 2, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO INSTALL GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION. OBSERVED IN THE MAIN ELECTRICAL RM NO INSTALLATION OF ELECTRODE GROUND ROD. EC 250.64, PROPERLY INSTALL GROUND ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR
Cited provision(s): 1D9 — EC 250.64 FAIL TO INSTALL GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR AS PER SECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39183049Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued April 2, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPARATUS, MATERIALS, DEVICES, APPLIANCES OR WIRING IN USE. OBSERVED IN THE OFFICE CUBICLES THE USE OF FLEX CORDS TO POWER ALSO IN THE BOILER RM ELECTRIC WIRE
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Elevator / Vertical Transportation — Summons 39183050X
CLASS - 1 · Issued April 2, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROTECT CONDUCTOR(S) AGAINST OVERCURRENT PER EC. OBSERVED IN THE ELEVATOR MACHINE RM THAT THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION IS INCORRECTLY SIZED. EC 240.4 MUST FOLLOW CODE., PROVIDE PROTECTION AGAINST OVERC
Cited provision(s): 1D6 — EC 240.4 FAILURE TO PROTECT CONDUCTOR(S) AGAINST OVERCURRENT PER EC
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Elevator charges often require licensed-elevator maintenance or repair, the required periodic inspection/test filing, an affirmation of correction where applicable, and reinspection for hazardous conditions.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the device number/location on the summons match the building's elevator record?
- Was the cited defect repaired or the device removed from service before the inspection?
- Were the required CAT/periodic inspection filings timely and accepted?
Evidence that may matter
- Elevator device record and inspection/test reports
- Maintenance contractor logs and repair tickets
- Affirmation of Correction / reinspection result
- Photographs or controller/service records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review