What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 6 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Site Safety / Safeguarding; Other Building / Code Compliance; Egress / Exit Obstruction; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 6, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 29, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557228H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE 2 STORY ALT CONSTRUCTION SITE I OBSERVED PIPE SCAFFOLD INSTALLED FROM BASEMENT TO THE 1ST FLOOR INSTALLED AND BEING USED IN A UNSAFE MANNER CONTRARY TO CODE 3314.1 . UNSAFE FOOTINGS
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39557232K
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION I OBSERVED A FENCE INSTALLED AT EXPOS 1 NOT CONSTRUCTED OR MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO CODE. FENCE NOT MAINTAINED IN SOUND CONDITION, DAMAGE OBSERVED. INSTALLED VIEWING PANEL BLOCKED BY THE INFO SIG
Cited provision(s): 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Site Safety / Safeguarding — Summons 39557218Y
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE 2 STORY ALT CONSTRUCTION SITE I OBSERVED TEMP PLATFORMS INSTALLED AT EXPOS 2 EXTERIOR, ON 1ST FLOOR INTERIOR (STAIR LOCATION) AND EXPOS 3 EXTERIOR. UPON REQUEST TO SEE DESIGN DRAWIN
Cited provision(s): 1F2 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
How this type of condition is typically resolved
These charges focus on protection of workers, occupants, neighboring property or the public during construction. Correction normally requires fixing the specific unsafe condition, documenting required safety measures and keeping the required site records current.
Hearing issues to verify
- What precise safety measure does the summons say was missing or inadequate?
- Was the condition temporary and corrected before or during the inspection?
- Did an approved site-safety plan or required site document address the cited condition?
Evidence that may matter
- Site Safety Plan / logistics drawings
- Daily safety logs and competent-person/site-safety records
- Photographs taken around the inspection time
- Contractor or safety-manager statements and correction records
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557229J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE 2 STORY ALT CONSTRUCTION SITE I OBSERVED NO FIRE EXTINGUISHERS INSTALLED/PROVIDED IN YARD AT EXPOS 1,3&4 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FDNY FIRE CODE. POTENTIAL FIRE HAZARDS OBSERVED IN YA
Cited provision(s): 1N6
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Egress / Exit Obstruction — Summons 39557222R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: UPON INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE 2 STORY ALT CONSTRUCTION SITE I OBSERVED NO ADEQUATE MEANS OF EGRESS PROVIDED TO ENTER AND EXIT THE STRUCTURE. I ALSO OBSERVED ON GOING WORK ON 2ND FLOOR WITH NO ADEQUATE MEANS OF E
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Egress charges are generally corrected by removing the obstruction or restoring the required exit width/path and then documenting that the means of egress is clear and code compliant.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the cited passageway actually required egress for the affected occupancy?
- Did the alleged obstruction exist when the inspector observed it?
- Was the condition immediately removed and can the timing be documented?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated photographs showing the exit path
- Approved floor/egress plans
- Building or security logs
- Statements or work records documenting removal of stored items/obstructions
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39557230R
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 29, 2026; hearing October 6, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: I OBSERVED INADEQUATE AND UNSAFE HOUSEKEEPING PRACTICES. I OBSERVED LARGE PILES OF ACCUMULATED COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL/DEBRIS AND TRASH STORED AT EXPOS 1 & 4 YARD WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES CONTRAR
Cited provision(s): 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 6 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review