What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Failure to Maintain; Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold. The hearing date is October 2, 2026; the source issue date(s) are January 16, 2025.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Failure to Maintain — Summons 35689728N
CLASS - 1 · Issued January 16, 2025; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER. AT TIME OF INSPECTION IT WAS OBSERVED DAMAGED LINTELS, CRACKS AND DETERIORATED MORTARJOINTS AND DAMAGED FIRE ESCAPES WERE OBSERVED AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS TH
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 35689729P
CLASS - 1 · Issued January 16, 2025; hearing October 2, 2026. · Hearing status: DEFAULT
DOB allegation in the source extract: FAILURE TO PROVIDE SIDEWALK SHED WHERE REQUIRED. AT TIME OF INSPECTIONIT WAS OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXPOSURES 1 AND 3. HOWEVER AT EXPOSURE 4 NO SIDEWALK SHED WAS IN PLACE AS REQUESTED BY VIOLATION
Cited provision(s): 131 — BC 3307.3.1,27-102(A) FAILURE TO PROVIDE SIDEWALK SHED WHERE REQUIRED
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review