What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Construction Fence; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 13, 2026; the source issue date(s) are June 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Construction Fence — Summons 39193298Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued June 22, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE ERECTED AND THERE IS NO CURRENT PERMIT ON FILE. PERMIT HAS EXPIRED., RENEW PERMIT
Cited provision(s): 207 — BC 105.8.2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON SITE-EXPIRED PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Construction-fence charges generally require bringing the fence, gates, viewing panels, height and site protection into compliance with the approved construction-safety setup and maintaining it for the required duration.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did the fence configuration on the inspection date match the approved/logistics plan?
- Was the cited opening or defect temporary and promptly corrected?
- Was a permit or construction-fence filing active where required?
Evidence that may matter
- Approved construction-fence/site logistics documents
- Dated photographs
- Contractor logs and correction invoice
- Permit/filing record
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39193299K
CLASS - 1 · Issued June 22, 2026; hearing October 13, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED TEMP CONST FENCE IS IN DISREPAIR W/SECTIONS MISSING FROM EXP 2 & 4. TEMP FENCE IS DETERIORATED/FAILING CREATING AN UNSAFE CONDITION ALLOWING CHILDREN TO ENTER THE SITE W/ STRUCTURE BEYOND FENCE IN DANG
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review