Failure to Maintain — Summons 39198392H
DOB allegation in the source extract: ASPER PREVIOUS REQUEST FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION ISSUED ON 03/27/2026, BY BADGE 3493 FOR USE OF PROHIBITED DOOR AND /OR HARDWARE PER BC 1008.1.8 (2014 CODE) ; 27-371 ;BC 1008.1.9( 2014CODE ) .AT TIME OF INSPECTION
Cited provision(s): 226 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER: USE OF PROHIBIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records