What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Zoning / Parking / Use; Failure to Maintain. The hearing dates are October 21, 2026, October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 4, 2026, July 22, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39197133Z
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 22, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: ATI I OBSERVED AN APPROX 5FT HIGH WHITE PVC FENCE, APPROX 35FT LONG ALONG THE FRONT SIDE YARD AT EXP1 THE HIGHT OF THE FENCE IS CONTRARY TO ZR23-44 REGULATIONS IN A R3X RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.; ZR 23-44, COMPLY W
Cited provision(s): 284 — ZR-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING RESOLUTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39199016Z
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 4, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED AT TOP OF EXP 1 TO THE RIGHT OF CENTER WINDOW A CRACK APPROX 3/4" WIDE IN THE MASONRY WALL. CRACK RUNS TO WINDOW LINTLE THEN BELOW WINDOW VERTICALLY DOWN APPROX 10'. POTENTIAL FOR WATER TO ENTER, BRICK
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review