What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 3 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: Zoning / Parking / Use; Electrical Work / Electrical Permit; Failure to Maintain. The hearing date is October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are March 13, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Zoning / Parking / Use — Summons 39180372P
CLASS - 2 · Issued March 13, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED AT EXP 4 A COMBUSTIBLE VINYL SHED WITHIN LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MIN 3' FROM PROPERTY LINE. RCNY REQUIRES MIN 3' FROM PROEPRTY LINE FOR COMBUSTIBLE SHEDS.; 101-14, COMPLY WITH ZONING RESOLUTION; COMPLY
Cited provision(s): 284 — ZR-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE ZONING RESOLUTION
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Zoning charges require comparing the observed use, parking arrangement or physical condition to the applicable zoning district, lawful occupancy and any prior approvals or variances. Correction can mean stopping the use, restoring required parking, or pursuing a lawful approval if available.
Hearing issues to verify
- Is the cited zoning district/use classification correct for this lot?
- Was the alleged use actually occurring on the issue date?
- Is there a prior BSA/CPC/DOB approval, variance or grandfathered condition relevant to the charge?
Evidence that may matter
- Zoning map and ZOLA/property records
- Certificate of Occupancy / approved plans
- Survey or parking layout
- Prior approvals, variances, permits and dated photographs
Electrical Work / Electrical Permit — Summons 39180373R
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 13, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED INSIDE REAR FIRST FLOOR BEHIND ENTRY DOOR EXPOSED LIVE ELECTRICAL PANEL. NO ELECTRICIAN ON SITE. POTENTIAL FOR SERIOUS INJURY OR ELECTROCUTION. ALSO 1 OUTLET HALF BURIED BEHIND NEW FRAMED WALL. ONLY HA
Cited provision(s): 1D2 — EC 110.2(A) UNAPPROVED/UNSAFE/UNSUITABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR WIRING IN USE
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Electrical charges generally require determining whether the cited installation was permitted and performed under the required licensed-electrical process, then correcting unsafe or unapproved work and obtaining any required inspection/acceptance.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was there an active electrical application/permit covering the cited wiring or equipment?
- Was the condition already corrected or disconnected before the inspection date?
- Does the cited equipment/location match the permitted scope and electrical inspection record?
Evidence that may matter
- Electrical permit/application and inspection records
- Licensed electrician invoice, letter or work order
- Photographs of wiring/equipment before and after correction
- Testing, certification or utility documentation where relevant
Failure to Maintain — Summons 39180375K
CLASS - 1 · Issued March 13, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED LARGE PILES OF CONST DEBRIS AT EXP 3 AND 4. DEBRIS CONSTING OF COMBUSTIBLE WOOD AND VINYL SIDING. ADDTIONALLY OBSERVED BROKEN MASONRY, SCATTERFED THROUGHOUT. APPROX 10 YDS., REPAIR AND/REPLACE
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
Failure-to-maintain charges are fact-specific. The owner should identify the exact building component or service equipment cited, repair the condition, and document the repair with evidence tied to the inspection location/date.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the description accurately identify the component, location and condition?
- Was the condition already repaired or not present when the summons was issued?
- Was another party responsible for maintenance under facts that are legally relevant to the respondent's liability?
Evidence that may matter
- Dated before/after photographs
- Repair invoices and contractor statements
- Professional inspection/report when structural or technical conditions are involved
- Maintenance logs and prior inspection records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 3 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review