What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 4 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold summonses; Work Without a Permit; Illegal Occupancy / Conversion. The hearing date is October 7, 2026; the source issue date(s) are July 15, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Work Without a Permit — Summons 39196176Y
CLASS - 2 · Issued July 15, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED EIFS INSTALLATION IN PROGRESS. FOAM BACKER INSTALLED, EIFS CORNICES INSTALLED WITH BASE COAT. WORK ON EXP 1,2,4., OBTAIN ALL PERMITS
Cited provision(s): 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The correction path usually starts by determining whether the observed work required a permit and whether the condition can legally remain. If it can remain, legalization may require plans, a filing, permit, inspections and closeout; if it cannot or the owner does not want to legalize it, restoration to a lawful condition may be required.
Hearing issues to verify
- Did a valid permit already cover the exact work described by the inspector on the issue date?
- Was the cited activity actually permit-required work, or was it maintenance / exempt work under the applicable facts?
- Do the approved drawings, permit scope and inspection history match the condition the inspector described?
- If a Stop Work Order was issued, was the work stopped and was any later work performed only after the required authorization?
Evidence that may matter
- Permit and DOB NOW/BIS job records that predate the inspection
- Approved plans and amendments showing the cited work
- Dated photographs of the condition and construction stage
- Contracts, invoices and contractor statements establishing what work was actually performed
- Inspection / sign-off records if the work was subsequently legalized
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39196179J
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 15, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD AT EXP 1 WITHIN LESS THAN 6" OF POWER LINE SUPPLYING HOUSE. POWER LINES ALSO RUN ACROSS WORK PLATFORM. POTENTIAL FOR ELECTROCUTION AND DEATH. BC 3314.4.4 REQUIRES MIN 10' FROM ELECTR
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Illegal Occupancy / Conversion — Summons 39196177X
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 15, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED 3 CAR (C0) GARAGE DOOR REMOVED AND WALL WITH WINDOWS AND SWING DOOR INSTALLED. INSIDE OBSERVED INTERIOR WALLS WITH DOORS CREATING ROOMS. C/O STATES 3 CAR GARAGE. SPACE IS BEING USED CONTRARY TO ITS INT
Cited provision(s): 103 — 28-118.3.2 OCC CONTRARY TO THAT ALLOWED BY THE C OF O OR DOB RECORDS
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The key question is whether the observed occupancy or layout matches the lawful use of the premises. Resolution may require restoring the prior lawful layout/use or, when legally feasible, filing plans and obtaining approvals to legalize the condition.
Hearing issues to verify
- What use and number of dwelling/occupancy units are shown by the Certificate of Occupancy, Schedule of Occupancy or other lawful-use records?
- Did the inspector accurately identify how the space was being used on the cited date?
- Was the cited space actually occupied as alleged, or were the observed beds, kitchens, locks or partitions consistent with another lawful use?
- Is there an approved filing or historical record supporting the present use?
Evidence that may matter
- Certificate of Occupancy / Schedule of Occupancy and approved plans
- Historic occupancy records, permits and prior approved layouts
- Dated photographs and floor plans
- Leases, tenant records or sworn statements concerning actual use
- Permits/inspection records if the condition was legalized or restored
Sidewalk Shed / Scaffold — Summons 39196178H
CLASS - 1 · Issued July 15, 2026; hearing October 7, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD IMPROPERLY ERECTED. BASE SITTING ON CMU ON STEPS, ALSO UPPER SECTION SITTING ON PLANKS. OBSERVED IMPROPER PLANKING ON WORK PLATFORMS, NO TOE BAORDS, GAURD RAILS. POTENTIAL FOR FALL P
Cited provision(s): 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The issue is typically whether the shed/scaffold was permitted, properly installed and maintained, and whether the equipment matched the approved filing and current safety requirements. Correction can involve permit renewal, physical modification, inspection, or removal.
Hearing issues to verify
- Was the equipment covered by an active permit on the inspection date?
- Did the installed dimensions/protection match the approved design?
- Was a cited defect already corrected before the summons was issued or served?
Evidence that may matter
- DOB NOW equipment permit and approved drawings
- Engineer/contractor inspection logs
- Dated site photographs
- Renewal or removal records
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 4 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review