What DOB is alleging at this property
This October hearing page is not just a schedule entry. The supplied DOB extract contains 2 summons records for this property identifier. The charge mix is: 2 Other Building / Code Compliance summonses. The hearing date is October 21, 2026; the source issue date(s) are August 8, 2026.
Important: The discussion below identifies correction paths, hearing issues and evidence worth investigating from the summons data. It does not state that a defense will succeed. OATH decides liability from the evidence and law presented in the case.
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557708R
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED VERTICAL SAFETY NETTING LOOSE AND NOT MAINTAINED TAUT ON MULTIPLE FLOORS THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING. TOE-BOARDS USED IN PLACE OF ZERO CABLES WERE NOT POSITIONED AND MAINTAINED AT DE
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Other Building / Code Compliance — Summons 39557707P
CLASS - 1 · Issued August 8, 2026; hearing October 21, 2026. · Hearing status: PENDING
DOB allegation in the source extract: AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE JOBSITE, REVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT LOGBOOK SHOWED THAT THE ALTERNATE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT HAD ACTED IN PLACE OF THE PRIMARY AND SIGNED THE LOGBOOK FOR M
Cited provision(s): 1P7
How this type of condition is typically resolved
The first step is to read the inspector's narrative together with every cited code section and determine exactly what act, condition or missing filing DOB alleges. The correction and hearing strategy should then be built around that specific charge rather than a generic violation-removal checklist.
Hearing issues to verify
- Does the summons identify the correct property, respondent, date and observed condition?
- Do agency records support or contradict the inspector's description?
- Was the condition corrected, permitted or otherwise resolved before the hearing?
Evidence that may matter
- Official DOB/OATH property and summons records
- Dated photographs and videos
- Permits, approved plans and inspection results
- Contracts, receipts, professional letters or witness statements tied to the cited condition
Case-specific next step
For this property, the first paid review should reconcile the 2 October summons records against the current OATH/DOB record, identify which alleged conditions remain open, and separate the hearing defense from the DOB correction / certification work. That prevents paying for correction work that does not address the actual charge—or appearing at OATH without the documents needed for the cited condition.
Submit These Summonses for Review