Skip to content
Violation library › Case analysis › 27-3018(B)
Inspector-description analysis · illustrative narrative

Electrical installation and permit: NYC DOB 27-3018(B) / OATH summons 39189625P

Original enforcement allegation, not a proven case outcome. The quotation below is from an inspector-written description in a public-record dataset. Extracts may end mid-sentence. The inspection origin, complete supporting evidence, legal finding, and disposition have not been independently verified. Interpretive explanations below are explicitly analytical possibilities.
Law citation: 27-3018(B)OATH infraction: 2C4Summons: 39189625P

Original inspector allegation — verbatim available export

RCA ISSUED 01/14/25 TO SAME RESPONDENT NOT CORRECTED UNAPPROVED UNSAFE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, DEVICES, APPLIANCES WIRING IN USE, AT EXP'S 4, (4) ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT BOXES INSTALLED TO POWER (4) WALL MOUNTED HV

Source limit: Source reference: NYC OATH/DOB summons 39189625P; BIN 4205325; export issue date 05/22/2026. The earlier export status was ACTIVE; obtain current status from DOB or OATH. The CSV contains a respondent mailing address, which is not presumed to identify the inspected property. This is the entire description available in the supplied export, not a certified full summons, inspector notes or evidentiary exhibits. The description is at the export’s approximately 210-character field limit and may terminate mid-word or mid-sentence.

Get the complete, authentic notice: search summons 39189625P in OATH Summons Finder instructions (download actual summons) and download the actual summons; review DOB records in NYC DOB records search. Never substitute the editorial discussion below for the inspector’s words.

Charge classification: law controls; keywords do not

Recorded citation: 27-3018(B); recorded infraction: 2C4. Primary legal issue: electrical code / permit issue. Interpretive issue: Electrical work/permit controls under historic code. This is a historical NYC electrical provision. Some infraction codes distinguish electrical work without a permit from failure to post a required electrical permit; confirm the actual charge.

What must be tested: Use licensed electrician inspection, circuit/panel schedule, DOB NOW/BIS electrical permit history, and dated conditions for the alleged location.

Possible exceptions and legal limitations: The electrical code edition, license requirement and work scope may change the route; do not treat a display allegation as proof of unsafe wiring. Eligibility is not established merely because the excerpt uses a word such as “repair”, “permit”, “cellar”, or “occupied”. Refer to NYC DOB construction codes.

Specific conditions mentioned in this inspector wording

1. Electrical installation and permit

Investigative test: Locate the exact wiring or equipment and determine whether the allegation is unsafe installation, unpermitted electrical work, posting, or inspection/permit status.

Evidence matched to this issue: Licensed-electrician site notes, panel/circuit identification, photos, electrical filing/permit history and test results when appropriate.

Boundary / potential counterexample: The evidence for a missing electrical work permit is not identical to proof of defective circuitry or missing display.

Inspector wording mapped to testable facts

Passage 1 — RCA ISSUED 01/14/25 TO SAME RESPONDENT NOT CORRECTED UNAPPROVED UNSAFE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, DEVICES, APPLIANCES WIRING IN US…

This recorded passage identifies a question about electrical installation and permit, not a proven final determination. Locate the exact wiring or equipment and determine whether the allegation is unsafe installation, unpermitted electrical work, posting, or inspection/permit status. The evidence for a missing electrical work permit is not identical to proof of defective circuitry or missing display.

Passage 2 — AT EXP'S 4, (4) ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT BOXES INSTALLED TO POWER (4) WALL MOUNTED HV

This recorded passage identifies a question about electrical installation and permit, not a proven final determination. Locate the exact wiring or equipment and determine whether the allegation is unsafe installation, unpermitted electrical work, posting, or inspection/permit status. The evidence for a missing electrical work permit is not identical to proof of defective circuitry or missing display.

Identifiers, locations, measurements and chronology to verify

Cited calendar date: 01/14/25
Check whether this is a permit expiry, previous summons issuance, reinspection or compliance deadline; each has a different consequence.

Case-specific correction decision tree

Branch A — physical or documentary defect persists: evaluate risk and the controlling technical text, then select correction. Branch B — it was already compliant on the cited date: marshal contemporaneous approved records and site evidence. Branch C — scope, code edition or identification is wrong: prepare a fact-by-fact comparison to the actual summons and cited regulation before advancing a defense or revised filing.

First targeted evidence collection: Licensed-electrician site notes, panel/circuit identification, photos, electrical filing/permit history and test results when appropriate. This is an investigative request, not a claim that the work or evidence already exists.

Editorial closure of the shortened allegation — NOT source text

Verbatim excerpt ends: “LIANCES WIRING IN USE, AT EXP'S 4, (4) ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT BOXES INSTALLED TO POWER (4) WALL MOUNTED HV”. Non-source editorial completion (conditional reconstruction, not a quotation): “The allegation appears to concern electrical installation and permit; whether additional observations, directions, dates, measurements or exceptions followed is unknown and must be checked in the original summons.”

No missing words, dates, measurements, liability conclusion or regulatory remedy have been invented. Even if the final syllable looks obvious, completing it as a purported inspector quotation would misstate an official record.

Response, certification and closing evidence

A hearing defense, correction of the underlying condition, a DOB AEU Certificate of Correction and payment of an imposed penalty are distinct questions. Retrieve the summons and confirm the OATH hearing or outcome and DOB violation status. Under current DOB guidance, Certificate of Correction review requests are made in DOB NOW: Safety → Violations & Notices of Deficiency; submitter/certifier signatures and evidence requirements are case-specific. Refer to Certificate of Correction instructions.

Source record limitations: The dataset does not authenticate who inspected the property, why inspection started, whether a defense succeeded, which contractor made repairs or whether AEU later accepted a correction. Do not turn this example into a claimed client success story or an invented inspection history.

Primary authority and fact-check links

Related library and official records

Official sources: Search DOB records · DOB summonses · Certificate of Correction FAQs · OATH hearing options · Construction codes

Need a resolution plan tied to the full summons?

Building Violation LLC can review the violation wording, permits, drawings, correction evidence and available OATH hearing procedures. A web example is not a determination of compliance for any property.

Call (866) 545-4440