Elevator device maintenance and safety devices: NYC DOB 28-301.1 / OATH summons 39153510K
Original inspector allegation — verbatim available export
XPELACE WORN GIBS WHERE NEEDED. SEAL HOIST MACHINE LEAKS. OIL LEKAING ONTO MACHINE ROOM FLOOR. ELIMINATE GAP AT TOP OF RIGHT BRAKE PAD. WORN BRAKE SLEEVE. INSUFFICIENT MACHINE ROOM LIGHTING
Source limit: Source reference: NYC OATH/DOB summons 39153510K; BIN 3036141; export issue date 07/14/2025. The earlier export status was ACTIVE; obtain current status from DOB or OATH. The CSV contains a respondent mailing address, which is not presumed to identify the inspected property. This is the entire description available in the supplied export, not a certified full summons, inspector notes or evidentiary exhibits. The description is at the export’s approximately 210-character field limit and may terminate mid-word or mid-sentence.
Get the complete, authentic notice: search summons 39153510K in OATH Summons Finder instructions (download actual summons) and download the actual summons; review DOB records in NYC DOB records search. Never substitute the editorial discussion below for the inspector’s words.
Charge classification: law controls; keywords do not
Recorded citation: 28-301.1; recorded infraction: 251. Primary legal issue: safe building maintenance. Interpretive issue: Owner maintenance obligation. AC 28-301.1 requires buildings, equipment, safeguards and means of egress to be kept safe and maintained. The physical condition, rather than whether a particular permit exists, is normally the central question.
What must be tested: The applicable underlying technical standard and the actual defective component determine a lawful repair. An assertion that the building is generally safe does not rebut a specific defect.
Possible exceptions and legal limitations: An exemption from cyclical façade reporting does not exempt a building from general safe-maintenance duties. Determine whether the special rule actually applies. Eligibility is not established merely because the excerpt uses a word such as “repair”, “permit”, “cellar”, or “occupied”. Refer to NYC DOB construction codes.
Specific conditions mentioned in this inspector wording
1. Elevator device maintenance and safety devices
Investigative test: Identify elevator/device number and distinguish physical safety components (brake, restrictor, alarm, car phone) from missing maintenance log/tag; compare against relevant ASME A17.1 / current DOB elevator rules.
Evidence matched to this issue: Elevator device record, contractor maintenance logs and tags, current test/inspection filings, dated component photos and qualified post-repair verification.
Boundary / potential counterexample: Do not treat a missing tag as proof of a failed device, or a device repair as proof that required maintenance record/inspection reporting was completed.
2. Roof and weather protection
Investigative test: Identify roof surface, drainage path, penetration and whether the alleged defect affects structure, exits, occupied rooms or adjacent properties.
Evidence matched to this issue: Roof plan, dated interior/exterior photos, contractor moisture/roofing findings, approved details and after-repair test where appropriate.
Boundary / potential counterexample: Not every patch requires an identical permit; ordinary-repair exemption and technical requirements must be tested against scope.
3. Structural and interior building component
Investigative test: Pin down floor, room and assembly; inspect dimensions, connections, condition and impact on fire separation or egress.
Evidence matched to this issue: Floor plan, measured photos, licensed design-professional report if structural, approved drawings and after-work inspection.
Boundary / potential counterexample: Structural work and cosmetic repair have different approval burdens; the inspector wording alone may not establish the distinction.
Inspector wording mapped to testable facts
Passage 1 — XPELACE WORN GIBS WHERE NEEDED.
Treat this passage as an asserted observation or reference. Check the named location, actor, object and time against contemporaneous photos and official filing records before drawing a regulatory conclusion.
Passage 2 — SEAL HOIST MACHINE LEAKS.
This recorded passage identifies a question about elevator device maintenance and safety devices, not a proven final determination. Identify elevator/device number and distinguish physical safety components (brake, restrictor, alarm, car phone) from missing maintenance log/tag; compare against relevant ASME A17.1 / current DOB elevator rules. Do not treat a missing tag as proof of a failed device, or a device repair as proof that required maintenance record/inspection reporting was completed.
Passage 3 — OIL LEKAING ONTO MACHINE ROOM FLOOR.
This recorded passage identifies a question about structural and interior building component, not a proven final determination. Pin down floor, room and assembly; inspect dimensions, connections, condition and impact on fire separation or egress. Structural work and cosmetic repair have different approval burdens; the inspector wording alone may not establish the distinction.
Passage 4 — ELIMINATE GAP AT TOP OF RIGHT BRAKE PAD.
Treat this passage as an asserted observation or reference. Check the named location, actor, object and time against contemporaneous photos and official filing records before drawing a regulatory conclusion.
Passage 5 — WORN BRAKE SLEEVE.
Treat this passage as an asserted observation or reference. Check the named location, actor, object and time against contemporaneous photos and official filing records before drawing a regulatory conclusion.
Passage 6 — INSUFFICIENT MACHINE ROOM LIGHTING
Treat this passage as an asserted observation or reference. Check the named location, actor, object and time against contemporaneous photos and official filing records before drawing a regulatory conclusion.
Identifiers, locations, measurements and chronology to verify
No uniquely parseable earlier summons number, permit number, date, exposure or measurement is established by this excerpt. The full notice and building profile should supply the missing keys; do not invent them.
Case-specific correction decision tree
Branch A — defect remains: assess risk and protection immediately, then undertake an appropriate licensed/engineered repair. Branch B — already repaired: pair before/after photos with scope, inspection and test results that address the *specific* defect. Branch C — inspector misidentified the component: use an elevation/floor key and technical field report; do not rely on an unspecific clean-inspection assertion.
First targeted evidence collection: Elevator device record, contractor maintenance logs and tags, current test/inspection filings, dated component photos and qualified post-repair verification. This is an investigative request, not a claim that the work or evidence already exists.
Editorial closure of the shortened allegation — NOT source text
Verbatim excerpt ends: “OOM FLOOR. ELIMINATE GAP AT TOP OF RIGHT BRAKE PAD. WORN BRAKE SLEEVE. INSUFFICIENT MACHINE ROOM LIGHTING”. Non-source editorial completion (conditional reconstruction, not a quotation): “The allegation appears to concern elevator device maintenance and safety devices; whether additional observations, directions, dates, measurements or exceptions followed is unknown and must be checked in the original summons.”
No missing words, dates, measurements, liability conclusion or regulatory remedy have been invented. Even if the final syllable looks obvious, completing it as a purported inspector quotation would misstate an official record.
Response, certification and closing evidence
A hearing defense, correction of the underlying condition, a DOB AEU Certificate of Correction and payment of an imposed penalty are distinct questions. Retrieve the summons and confirm the OATH hearing or outcome and DOB violation status. Under current DOB guidance, Certificate of Correction review requests are made in DOB NOW: Safety → Violations & Notices of Deficiency; submitter/certifier signatures and evidence requirements are case-specific. Refer to Certificate of Correction instructions.
Source record limitations: The dataset does not authenticate who inspected the property, why inspection started, whether a defense succeeded, which contractor made repairs or whether AEU later accepted a correction. Do not turn this example into a claimed client success story or an invented inspection history.
Primary authority and fact-check links
- OATH Summons Finder instructions (download actual summons) — enter summons 39153510K and obtain the signed notice.
- NYC DOB construction codes — verify law wording and any exception.
- BIS / DOB NOW record limitations — older BIS violations may not be in DOB NOW.
- Certificate of Correction instructions — review current COC procedure, signatures and evidence.
Related library and official records
Official sources: Search DOB records · DOB summonses · Certificate of Correction FAQs · OATH hearing options · Construction codes
Need a resolution plan tied to the full summons?
Building Violation LLC can review the violation wording, permits, drawings, correction evidence and available OATH hearing procedures. A web example is not a determination of compliance for any property.