Skip to content
Violation library › Case analysis › 28-105.11
Inspector-description analysis · administrative review

Boiler device inspection and filing: NYC DOB 28-105.11 / OATH summons 39202350Z

Original enforcement allegation, not a proven case outcome. The quotation below is from an inspector-written description in a public-record dataset. Extracts may end mid-sentence. The inspection origin, complete supporting evidence, legal finding, and disposition have not been independently verified. Interpretive explanations below are explicitly analytical possibilities.
Law citation: 28-105.11OATH infraction: 220Summons: 39202350Z

Original inspector allegation — verbatim available export

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE JOB PERMIT #B01186185-I1-PL EXPIRES ON 12/09/2026 ARE NOT POSTED AT THE PREMISES., POST/PROPERLY POST PERMIT

Source limit: Source reference: NYC OATH/DOB summons 39202350Z; BIN 3337867; export issue date 08/28/2026. The earlier export status was ACTIVE; obtain current status from DOB or OATH. The CSV contains a respondent mailing address, which is not presumed to identify the inspected property. This is the entire description available in the supplied export, not a certified full summons, inspector notes or evidentiary exhibits. The export field may still omit pages, attachments or context contained in the actual summons.

Get the complete, authentic notice: search summons 39202350Z in OATH Summons Finder instructions (download actual summons) and download the actual summons; review DOB records in NYC DOB records search. Never substitute the editorial discussion below for the inspector’s words.

Charge classification: law controls; keywords do not

Recorded citation: 28-105.11; recorded infraction: 220. Primary legal issue: permit-display obligation. Interpretive issue: Permit must be displayed at the worksite. AC 28-105.11 governs posting the building permit or copy at the worksite in a public-visible location during applicable work or equipment use. This differs from whether a permit was obtained.

What must be tested: Check actual permit identity, posting location, visibility, and dates. The permitted scope and display duty should not be collapsed into a general unpermitted-work charge.

Possible exceptions and legal limitations: If the work had ended or the permit had expired, establish the legally relevant display period and documented site conditions rather than presuming that an active permit automatically establishes compliance. Eligibility is not established merely because the excerpt uses a word such as “repair”, “permit”, “cellar”, or “occupied”. Refer to NYC DOB construction codes.

Specific conditions mentioned in this inspector wording

1. Boiler device inspection and filing

Investigative test: Determine whether the alleged defect is missing periodic inspection/report, a physical unsafe condition or unpermitted replacement; link the device identifier to the required inspection cycle.

Evidence matched to this issue: Boiler device/installation record, agency filing receipt, inspector qualification, report and any affirmation-of-correction documentation.

Boundary / potential counterexample: A physical tune-up invoice is not a filed annual boiler inspection report, and filing alone does not resolve a real hazard.

2. Permit validity timeline

Investigative test: Compare the alleged work time with actual issuance, expiry and renewal records; identify which specific activity occurred after expiration.

Evidence matched to this issue: Full permit history, renewal record, contractor daily logs, dated inspection photographs and closeout entries.

Boundary / potential counterexample: Distinguish work after expiry from the mere appearance of an expired document in a database.

Inspector wording mapped to testable facts

Passage 1 — AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED ACTIVE JOB PERMIT #B01186185-I1-PL EXPIRES ON 12/09/2026 ARE NOT POSTED AT THE PREMISES., POST…

This recorded passage identifies a question about permit validity timeline, not a proven final determination. Compare the alleged work time with actual issuance, expiry and renewal records; identify which specific activity occurred after expiration. Distinguish work after expiry from the mere appearance of an expired document in a database.

Identifiers, locations, measurements and chronology to verify

Job, permit or filing identifier: B01186185-I1-PL
Query the exact application/permit; compare the authorized work description with inspection observations, dates and sign-off.
Cited calendar date: 12/09/2026
Check whether this is a permit expiry, previous summons issuance, reinspection or compliance deadline; each has a different consequence.

Case-specific correction decision tree

Branch A — valid permit and no required display: post it as required and document the actual location, without claiming that present-day posting erases a past offense. Branch B — displayed on relevant date: obtain dated site images and witnesses to the public-visible posting location. Branch C — permit expired or scope disputed: separately investigate validity/scope without recasting the posting charge as unpermitted construction.

First targeted evidence collection: Boiler device/installation record, agency filing receipt, inspector qualification, report and any affirmation-of-correction documentation. This is an investigative request, not a claim that the work or evidence already exists.

Editorial closure of the shortened allegation — NOT source text

The visible description does not show the same clear character-limit truncation flag, but additional pages or attachments may still exist. No editorial sentence is treated as part of the inspector’s wording.

Response, certification and closing evidence

A hearing defense, correction of the underlying condition, a DOB AEU Certificate of Correction and payment of an imposed penalty are distinct questions. Retrieve the summons and confirm the OATH hearing or outcome and DOB violation status. Under current DOB guidance, Certificate of Correction review requests are made in DOB NOW: Safety → Violations & Notices of Deficiency; submitter/certifier signatures and evidence requirements are case-specific. Refer to Certificate of Correction instructions.

Source record limitations: The dataset does not authenticate who inspected the property, why inspection started, whether a defense succeeded, which contractor made repairs or whether AEU later accepted a correction. Do not turn this example into a claimed client success story or an invented inspection history.

Primary authority and fact-check links

Related library and official records

Official sources: Search DOB records · DOB summonses · Certificate of Correction FAQs · OATH hearing options · Construction codes

Need a resolution plan tied to the full summons?

Building Violation LLC can review the violation wording, permits, drawings, correction evidence and available OATH hearing procedures. A web example is not a determination of compliance for any property.

Call (866) 545-4440