Skip to content
Building Violation LLC| NYC Violation Guides
Violation guide › Scenarios › Roof, flashing or drainage deterioration
Enforcement scenario guide

Roof, flashing or drainage deterioration

Practical questions to investigate when an NYC Department of Buildings notice describes roof, flashing or drainage deterioration. See the actual summons for the controlling allegations.

Cited law label: 28-105.159 associated source record(s)
Scenario vs. completed case: This guide is derived from enforcement allegations in a DOB-ECB dataset; it does not claim a client outcome, dismissal, permit issuance or verified site history. Narrative fields in the export are truncated, so full summonses must be checked before drawing case-specific conclusions.

What this enforcement scenario describes

This scenario concerns roof, flashing or drainage deterioration, associated in the source export with 28-105.1. The source data describe allegations—not independently verified findings or completed client projects.

How to evaluate this particular condition

Identify the source of water penetration or deterioration and the extent of damage.

Potential correction approach

Assess maintenance versus permitted replacement, correct defects and document completed work. The legally appropriate path may differ with permit history, physical site conditions, applicable code edition and the wording of the actual summons.

Evidence to start assembling

Roofing records, waterproofing or drainage report and photographs. Keep originals, date photographs, and check that the supporting records address every listed condition.

Questions worth resolving before filing

Specific clues in the enforcement descriptions

These are text indicators extracted from the source records for this precise law-and-scenario combination. They show what inspectors mentioned, not whether the allegation was proven or how a property was ultimately corrected.

Severity labels found in this subset: CLASS - 2 (33), CLASS - 1 (24), CLASS - 3 (2). Severity depends on the actual summons; it cannot be determined from a topic title.

Permit-and-plan review for 28-105.1

Compare the specific work with DOB-approved filings. Determine whether permitted legalization, an amendment to approved plans, correction under a properly authorized scope, or removal and restoration is supportable. Work-without-permit situations can also involve separate DOB civil penalties; check the notice and DOB records.

General DOB/OATH resolution pathway

  1. Identify the controlling documents. Locate the actual summons, inspector narrative, cited rule, OATH hearing date and any related DOB orders. The same code label can cover distinct situations.
  2. Address immediate risks. If the condition poses a safety threat or is subject to a stop-work or vacate order, comply with applicable restrictions and obtain appropriate professional assistance promptly.
  3. Select a supportable corrective approach. That may involve stopping a use, repairing or removing unauthorized work, obtaining permits, inspections or professional evaluation. Legalization is not assured.
  4. Separate hearing response from DOB correction. Respond to OATH as required. A payment or hearing outcome does not automatically establish that all DOB correction requirements are satisfied.
  5. Document and certify correction. Where required, submit the Certificate of Correction through DOB NOW: Safety → Violations & Notices of Deficiency, including the proper attestations and applicable evidence. Monitor DOB status after submission.

Related law and infraction-code references

28-105.1 legal-section guide

Other problems cited under this law label

Official reference links

Need help with a specific NYC DOB violation?

Building Violation LLC can review the summons, relevant building records, corrective filing options and OATH hearing needs. The right approach depends on the original notice and site conditions.

Call (866) 545-4440 Visit Building Violation LLC