November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

102 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 4 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 102 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206. The source records identify construction-site safety, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, work not conforming to approved documents and hearing dates on November 25, 2026 and November 4, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Construction-site safetySidewalk shed / temporary construction protectionWork not conforming to approved documentsWork without a permit

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
102 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3327938
BBL
3030510010 (3/3051/10)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
4
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 25, 2026, November 4, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558361L
Normalized: 039558361L
November 4, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Construction-site safety
39558362N
Normalized: 039558362N
November 4, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39558363P
Normalized: 039558363P
November 4, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39204308Y
Normalized: 039204308Y
November 25, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Work without a permit

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 4 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558361L — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039558361L
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency. The inspector's description specifically references dwelling/occupancy configuration.

Specific record details: dwelling/occupancy configuration.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVED CONVERSION OF A MIXED USED BUILDING TO A 7 DWELLING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING, UPON REQUEST TO SPEAK WITH A CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT AS PER 3301.13.3 NONE WAS ON SITE AND NO ONE ON THE PERMIT, AFTER REVI

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Site Safety
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1G6 — BC 3301.13.3 FAILURE TO DESIGNATE AND/OR HAVE A CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed conversion of a mixed used building to a 7 dwelling residential building, upon request to speak with a construction superintendent as per 3301.13.3 none was on site and no one on the permit, after revi.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Violation 2

Summons 39558362N — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558362N
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references debris/housekeeping and exposure 1.

Specific record details: debris/housekeeping, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLDS AT EXP#1&3 MISSING TOEBOARDS, MISSING GUARDRAILS, MISSING PINS, NOT FULLY PLANKED PLATFORMS, PLANKS NOT BEING TIE DOWN, LOOSE NETTING,MAKESHIFT CONNECTIONS, DEBRIS AND LOOSE MATERI

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed supported scaffolds at exp#1&3 missing toeboards, missing guardrails, missing pins, not fully planked platforms, planks not being tie down, loose netting,makeshift connections, debris and loose materi.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 3

Summons 39558363P — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558363P
OATH hearingNovember 4, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references exposure 1.

Specific record details: exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVED STREET OPERATIONS AT EXP#1 WITH UNPROTECTED TREE MATERIALS STORED ON STREET WITHOUT ANY BARRIERS CONTRARY TO SITE SAFETY PLANS THAT SHOW JERSEY BARRIERS AROUND THE LOADING AREA AND TREE PROTECTION FOR

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed street operations at exp#1 with unprotected tree materials stored on street without any barriers contrary to site safety plans that show jersey barriers around the loading area and tree protection for.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 4

Summons 39204308Y — Work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039204308Y
OATH hearingNovember 25, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that construction or alteration work was performed without the required permit.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 16, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT. AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED MECHANICAL WORK BEING PERFORMED WITHOUT MS PW2 FILED ON DOB SYSTEM., OBTAIN ALL PERMITS; PLEASE SUBMIT PERMIT TO [email protected]

Issue date
September 16, 2026
Served date
September 16, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED MECHANICAL WORK BEING PERFORMED WITHOUT MS PW2 FILED ON DOB SYSTEM.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that construction or alteration work occurred without the permit required for that scope. The key resolution question is whether the current condition can be legalized, is already covered by an existing approval, or must be restored/removed.

What may be required to correct the condition

Research the permit and approved-plan history before choosing a cure. If the work can legally remain, a registered architect or professional engineer may need to prepare or amend drawings and coordinate permits; licensed trades may be required for regulated work. If legalization is not viable, restoration to an approved condition may be the faster path.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the actual scope observed, the permit record in effect on the inspection date, whether the cited work matches an approved filing, who was responsible for the work, and any photographs or records showing the condition before or after correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Compare the inspector's description to the approved plans and permit scope, determine when the work was performed, and verify whether the work was exempt, previously approved, or later legalized. None of those possibilities should be assumed without records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB permit/application history
  • approved plans and amendments
  • photographs of the cited work
  • contracts, invoices and contractor records
  • proof of restoration/legalization and any inspection or sign-off records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 102 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206

For 102 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206, the current source extract points to construction-site safety, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, work not conforming to approved documents. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.