November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

14-35 Astoria Boulevard, Queens, NY 11102 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 3 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 14-35 Astoria Boulevard, Queens, NY 11102. The source records identify work without a permit, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection and a hearing date of November 10, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Work without a permitSidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
14-35 Astoria Boulevard, Queens, NY 11102
Borough
Queens
BIN
4430182
BBL
4005400019 (4/540/19)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
3
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 10, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39202226L
Normalized: 039202226L
November 10, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Work without a permit
39558564L
Normalized: 039558564L
November 10, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39558734P
Normalized: 039558734P
November 10, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 3 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. Several descriptions point to the same area (sidewalk shed), which is a sign the summonses may be factually connected. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39202226L — Work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039202226L
OATH hearingNovember 10, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that construction or alteration work was performed without the required permit. The inspector's description specifically references front area and sidewalk shed.

Specific record details: front area, sidewalk shed.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT FRONT OF BUILDING SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED. DOB RECORDS INDICATE NO PERMITS ISSUED FOR THIS WORK., OBTAIN PERMIT; OBTAIN PERMIT

Issue date
August 27, 2026
Served date
August 28, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at front of building sidewalk shed installed. DOB records indicate no permits issued for this work.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that construction or alteration work occurred without the permit required for that scope. The key resolution question is whether the current condition can be legalized, is already covered by an existing approval, or must be restored/removed.

What may be required to correct the condition

Research the permit and approved-plan history before choosing a cure. If the work can legally remain, a registered architect or professional engineer may need to prepare or amend drawings and coordinate permits; licensed trades may be required for regulated work. If legalization is not viable, restoration to an approved condition may be the faster path.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the actual scope observed, the permit record in effect on the inspection date, whether the cited work matches an approved filing, who was responsible for the work, and any photographs or records showing the condition before or after correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Compare the inspector's description to the approved plans and permit scope, determine when the work was performed, and verify whether the work was exempt, previously approved, or later legalized. None of those possibilities should be assumed without records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB permit/application history
  • approved plans and amendments
  • photographs of the cited work
  • contracts, invoices and contractor records
  • proof of restoration/legalization and any inspection or sign-off records
Violation 2

Summons 39558564L — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558564L
OATH hearingNovember 10, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING INSPECTION OF A SIDEWALK SHED INSTALLED AT EXPOSURE #1 DOB RECORDS REVEALED THAT THERE WAS NO ACTIVE PERMIT FOR THE INSTALL OF THE SHED WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED WHILE THE SIDEWALK SHEDS IS IN P

Issue date
August 31, 2026
Served date
August 31, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 207 — BC 105.8.2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON SITE-EXPIRED PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning during inspection of a sidewalk shed installed at exposure #1 DOB records revealed that there was no active permit for the install of the shed which is required to be maintained while the sidewalk sheds is in p.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 3

Summons 39558734P — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558734P
OATH hearingNovember 10, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed, plumbing lines/fixtures and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, plumbing lines/fixtures, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF SIDEWALK SHED THAT WAS STRUCK BY A VEHICLE ON 8/27/26 AT EXP 1 OF A 3 STORY BUILDING OBSERVED VERTICAL MEMBER AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE NOT UPRIGHT STRAIGHT AND PLUMB. VERTICAL MEMBERS NOT B

Issue date
September 3, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OF SIDEWALK SHED THAT WAS STRUCK BY A VEHICLE ON 8/27/26 AT EXP 1 OF A 3 STORY BUILDING OBSERVED VERTICAL MEMBER AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE NOT UPRIGHT STRAIGHT AND PLUMB. VERTICAL MEMBERS NOT B.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation. Because plumbing or gas components are described, a licensed-trade review may be needed even if the main summons is categorized differently.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 14-35 Astoria Boulevard, Queens, NY 11102

For 14-35 Astoria Boulevard, Queens, NY 11102, the current source extract points to work without a permit, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.