November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

151 Starr Street, Brooklyn, NY 11237 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 5 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 151 Starr Street, Brooklyn, NY 11237. The source records identify sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, dob/oath code-compliance issue, work not conforming to approved documents and a hearing date of November 18, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protectionDOB/OATH code-compliance issueWork not conforming to approved documents

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
151 Starr Street, Brooklyn, NY 11237
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3072577
BBL
3031870047 (3/3187/47)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
5
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 18, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558720Y
Normalized: 039558720Y
November 18, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39558721X
Normalized: 039558721X
November 18, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558722H
Normalized: 039558722H
November 18, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39558723J
Normalized: 039558723J
November 18, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558724L
Normalized: 039558724L
November 18, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 5 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558720Y — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558720Y
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: ACTIVE GROUNDING OPERATIONS WITH NO FLAGGERS, NO WARNING SIGNS, INADEQUATE/MISSING BARRIERS, NO MEANS OF PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION CONTRARY TO BC 3307.4. CREATING A POTENTIAL SAFETY

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED: ACTIVE GROUNDING OPERATIONS WITH NO FLAGGERS, NO WARNING SIGNS, INADEQUATE/MISSING BARRIERS, NO MEANS OF PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION CONTRARY TO BC 3307.4. CREATING A POTENTIAL SAFETY.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 2

Summons 39558721X — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558721X
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: INADEQUATE STORAGE ZONE TOTALLY ACCESSIBLE, INSIDE WITH MATERIALS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NOT FULLY SHIELDED OR BARRICADED CONTRARY TO BC 3303.4.7 CREATING UNSAFE CONDITION FOR PUB

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED: INADEQUATE STORAGE ZONE TOTALLY ACCESSIBLE, INSIDE WITH MATERIALS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NOT FULLY SHIELDED OR BARRICADED CONTRARY TO BC 3303.4.7 CREATING UNSAFE CONDITION FOR PUB.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 3

Summons 39558722H — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558722H
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references excavation.

Specific record details: excavation.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: EXCAVATION WORK CONTRARY TO APPROVED DRAWINGS. SOE-005.00. EXCAVATION EXCEEDS DEEPER MEETING FOUNDATION WALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES AT EXPO# 2-4. NO 45 SLOPED EXCAVATION ANGLE CREA

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED: EXCAVATION WORK CONTRARY TO APPROVED DRAWINGS. SOE-005.00. EXCAVATION EXCEEDS DEEPER MEETING FOUNDATION WALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES AT EXPO# 2-4. NO 45 SLOPED EXCAVATION ANGLE CREA.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 4

Summons 39558723J — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558723J
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: CONTRACTOR USING A GENERATOR PART OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO PERFORM PILES/GROUNDING UPON REQUEST FOR DOT PERMIT, NONE WAS PROVIDED CONTRARY TO BC 3307.2.1 CREATING UNSAFE CO

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED: CONTRACTOR USING A GENERATOR PART OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO PERFORM PILES/GROUNDING UPON REQUEST FOR DOT PERMIT, NONE WAS PROVIDED CONTRARY TO BC 3307.2.1 CREATING UNSAFE CO.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 5

Summons 39558724L — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558724L
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

15 RCNY 20-08 (B) AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED: ACTIVE JOB SITE, GROUNDING PILES EXPO# 4, HYDRANT HAS BEEN USED. UPON REVIEWING PERMIT # C005616938 WAS EXPIRED ON 09/01/2026. CREATING UNSAFE CONDITION FOR SAF

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 206 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED: ACTIVE JOB SITE, GROUNDING PILES EXPO# 4, HYDRANT HAS BEEN USED. UPON REVIEWING PERMIT # C005616938 WAS EXPIRED ON 09/01/2026. CREATING UNSAFE CONDITION FOR SAF.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 151 Starr Street, Brooklyn, NY 11237

For 151 Starr Street, Brooklyn, NY 11237, the current source extract points to sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, dob/oath code-compliance issue, work not conforming to approved documents. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.