Summons 39555234P — Egress / fire-escape obstruction
Normalized lookup key: 039555234PWhat DOB alleges
DOB alleges that a required exit, fire-escape or egress route was obstructed or otherwise noncompliant. The inspector's description specifically references railing/guard condition.
Specific record details: railing/guard condition.
Full violation description from the source extract
AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OBSERVED CS WASN'T PRESENT BUT COMPETENT WAS BUT THE SITE CONDITIONS 3301.13.7 CS FAILED TO ADDRESS, OPEN LEDGES WITHOUT INSTALLING GUARDRAIL SYSTEM,NO EGRESS/INGRESS ACCESS,ACTIVE
- Issue date
- June 8, 2026
- Served date
- June 8, 2026
- Source violation type
- Unknown
- Severity
- CLASS - 2
- Hearing status in source extract
- PENDING
- 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the time of my inspection observed cs wasn't present but competent was but the site conditions 3301.13.7 cs failed to address, open ledges without installing guardrail system,no egress/ingress access,active.
What this violation means
DOB is alleging that required egress or a fire-escape route was obstructed or otherwise did not provide the required clear path. Egress conditions are life-safety issues and the exact route/location described matters.
What may be required to correct the condition
The cited path should be cleared or restored so required egress is unobstructed. If the issue involves construction, stairs, doors, fire escapes or layout rather than movable objects, professional review and permits may be needed before the condition can be considered corrected. Any correction should preserve the required egress route rather than simply moving the problem to another part of the exit system.
What the OATH hearing may involve
At OATH, photographs from the inspection date, floor/egress plans, evidence showing whether the obstruction existed, and proof of prompt correction can be relevant.
Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating
Verify the exact egress route, whether the objects/condition actually reduced the required path, whether the cited area was a required exit component, and whether the condition had been corrected before or after service.
Documents and evidence that may be useful
- dated photographs of the cited egress route
- approved floor/egress plans where applicable
- repair/removal records
- inspection reports
- proof of correction