(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

172-09 140 Avenue, Queens, NY 11434 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 2 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 172-09 140 Avenue, Queens, NY 11434. The source records identify work without a permit, egress / fire-escape obstruction and a hearing date of November 17, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Work without a permitEgress / fire-escape obstruction

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
172-09 140 Avenue, Queens, NY 11434
Borough
Queens
BIN
4270803
BBL
4125780006 (4/12578/6)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
2
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 17, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39203284Y
Normalized: 039203284Y		 November 17, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Work without a permit
39203285X
Normalized: 039203285X		 November 17, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Egress / fire-escape obstruction

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 2 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. Several descriptions point to the same area (front), which is a sign the summonses may be factually connected. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39203284Y — Work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039203284Y
OATH hearingNovember 17, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that construction or alteration work was performed without the required permit. The inspector's description specifically references front area, brick/masonry condition and exposure 1.

Specific record details: front area, brick/masonry condition, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

ATOI BSERVED STRUCTURAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT, THE FRONT STAIRS REMOVED A NEW WIDER STAIR UNDER CONSTRUCTION CMU CONCRETE , REBARS AND BRICKS , CONSTRUCTION OF A CMU & BRICK FENCE (EXPOSURE #1), APPROX 250 LF O

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 8, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning atoi bserved structural work without a permit, the front stairs removed a new wider stair under construction cmu concrete , rebars and bricks , construction of a cmu & brick fence (exposure #1), approx 250 lf o.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that construction or alteration work occurred without the permit required for that scope. The key resolution question is whether the current condition can be legalized, is already covered by an existing approval, or must be restored/removed.

What may be required to correct the condition

Research the permit and approved-plan history before choosing a cure. If the work can legally remain, a registered architect or professional engineer may need to prepare or amend drawings and coordinate permits; licensed trades may be required for regulated work. If legalization is not viable, restoration to an approved condition may be the faster path.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the actual scope observed, the permit record in effect on the inspection date, whether the cited work matches an approved filing, who was responsible for the work, and any photographs or records showing the condition before or after correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Compare the inspector's description to the approved plans and permit scope, determine when the work was performed, and verify whether the work was exempt, previously approved, or later legalized. None of those possibilities should be assumed without records. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB permit/application history
  • approved plans and amendments
  • photographs of the cited work
  • contracts, invoices and contractor records
  • proof of restoration/legalization and any inspection or sign-off records
Violation 2

Summons 39203285X — Egress / fire-escape obstruction

Normalized lookup key: 039203285X
OATH hearingNovember 17, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that a required exit, fire-escape or egress route was obstructed or otherwise noncompliant. The inspector's description specifically references rear area, front area and debris/housekeeping.

Specific record details: rear area, front area, debris/housekeeping.

Full violation description from the source extract

ATOI OBSERVED CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS & MATERIALS STORED ALONG THE FRONT , SIDE & REAR YARDS AT EXPS #1 2 & 3 EXPO# 2 IS CURRENTLY BEING USED AS AN EGRESS PATH, AS THE FRONT ENTRANCE IS NOT IN USE AND ACCESS TO THE

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 8, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 102 — 28-301.1 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BLDG IN CODE-COMPLIANT MANNER
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning atoi observed construction debris & materials stored along the front , side & rear yards at exps #1 2 & 3 expo# 2 is currently being used as an egress path, as the front entrance is not in use and access to the.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that required egress or a fire-escape route was obstructed or otherwise did not provide the required clear path. Egress conditions are life-safety issues and the exact route/location described matters.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited path should be cleared or restored so required egress is unobstructed. If the issue involves construction, stairs, doors, fire escapes or layout rather than movable objects, professional review and permits may be needed before the condition can be considered corrected. Any correction should preserve the required egress route rather than simply moving the problem to another part of the exit system.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, photographs from the inspection date, floor/egress plans, evidence showing whether the obstruction existed, and proof of prompt correction can be relevant.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Verify the exact egress route, whether the objects/condition actually reduced the required path, whether the cited area was a required exit component, and whether the condition had been corrected before or after service. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • dated photographs of the cited egress route
  • approved floor/egress plans where applicable
  • repair/removal records
  • inspection reports
  • proof of correction
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 172-09 140 Avenue, Queens, NY 11434

For 172-09 140 Avenue, Queens, NY 11434, the current source extract points to work without a permit, egress / fire-escape obstruction. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Work-without-permit resolution Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages