(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

214-248 East 34 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 3 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 214-248 East 34 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016. The source records identify failure to maintain, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, work not conforming to approved documents and a hearing date of November 19, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Failure to maintainSidewalk shed / temporary construction protectionWork not conforming to approved documents

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
214-248 East 34 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016
Borough
Manhattan
BIN
1088117
BBL
1009140036 (1/914/36)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
3
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 19, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558945P
Normalized: 039558945P		 November 19, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Failure to maintain
39558948K
Normalized: 039558948K		 November 19, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39558950J
Normalized: 039558950J		 November 19, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Work not conforming to approved documents

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 3 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558945P — Failure to maintain

Normalized lookup key: 039558945P
OATH hearingNovember 19, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges failure to maintain the cited building component or condition in a code-compliant manner. The inspector's description specifically references exposure 3.

Specific record details: exposure 3.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING INSPECTION OF THE 21-STORY BUILDING ALTERATION, OBSERVED C-HOOK IN USED AT EXPOSURE 3 UPON REQUEST OF MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATION NON WAS PROVIDED. CONTRARY TO BC CODE 3301.7 (2014 CODE)

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 9, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2F7 — BC 3301.7 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN/DISPLAY ON SITE DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY BC CHAPTER 3
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning during inspection of the 21-story building alteration, observed c-hook in used at exposure 3 upon request of manufacturers specification non was provided. contrary to bc code 3301.7 (2014 code).

What this violation means

DOB is alleging failure to maintain the building or a building component in a code-compliant condition. The broad label matters less than the particular defect described by the inspector.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited component should be inspected and repaired by the appropriate qualified contractor or licensed/registered professional where the work requires it. Permits or filings may be needed if the repair goes beyond ordinary maintenance.

What the OATH hearing may involve

The strongest factual material usually concerns the exact condition on the inspection date: photographs, maintenance records, professional reports, repair invoices and proof of correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Focus on the precise component and location in the description, whether the defect existed as alleged, whether the owner/respondent controlled that area, and whether later inspection or repair records clarify the condition.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • dated photographs
  • maintenance and repair records
  • contractor or professional reports
  • permits/inspection records if repair work required them
  • proof of correction
Violation 2

Summons 39558948K — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558948K
OATH hearingNovember 19, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING INSPECTION OF THE 21-STORY FACADE ALTERATION, OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD PLATFORM IN USE AT EXP?3. UPON REVIEW OF THEIR CD5 AND RELATED DOCUMENTS NO PRE AND POST INSTALLATION INSPECTION LETTER WAS PROVI

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 9, 2026
Source violation type
Cranes and Derricks
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 149 — BC 3314.4.3.1 (2008 CODE), 27-1045 & BC 3314.4.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO PERFORM SAFE/PROPER INSPECTION OF SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD.
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning during inspection of the 21-story facade alteration, observed suspended scaffold platform in use at exp?3. upon review of their cd5 and related documents no pre and post installation inspection letter was provi.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 3

Summons 39558950J — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558950J
OATH hearingNovember 19, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring and exposure 3.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring, exposure 3.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING THE INSPECTION OF ALTERATION 21 STORY BUILDING, OBSERVED SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDS @EXP#3. SUSPENDED SCAFFOLD SETUP CONTRARY TO APPROVED CD-5. PLAN SHOWING OUTRIGGER BEAMS, IN USED OUTRIGGER BEAM AND C-HOOK I

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 9, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning during the inspection of alteration 21 story building, observed suspended scaffolds @exp#3. suspended scaffold setup contrary to approved cd-5. plan showing outrigger beams, in used outrigger beam and c-hook i.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 214-248 East 34 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016

For 214-248 East 34 Street, Manhattan, NY 10016, the current source extract points to failure to maintain, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, work not conforming to approved documents. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages