November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

3116 Garage Avenue I, Brooklyn, NY 11210 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 3 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 3116 Garage Avenue I, Brooklyn, NY 11210. The source records identify construction-site safety, construction fence / site protection, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection and a hearing date of November 18, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Construction-site safetyConstruction fence / site protectionSidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
3116 Garage Avenue I, Brooklyn, NY 11210
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3207130
BBL
3075950047 (3/7595/47)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
3
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 18, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558865P
Normalized: 039558865P
November 18, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Construction-site safety
39558866R
Normalized: 039558866R
November 18, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Construction fence / site protection
39558867Z
Normalized: 039558867Z
November 18, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

How the summonses fit together at this property

These summonses form a construction-site compliance cluster rather than a single generic violation. They address different safety, temporary-protection, approved-plan or work-control obligations at the same property. Several descriptions point to the same area (rear yard), which is a sign the summonses may be factually connected. Site records should be organized by inspection date and cited condition so the correction and hearing response for one summons is not mistakenly used for another.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558865P — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039558865P
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency. The inspector's description specifically references rear yard, rear area and exposure 4.

Specific record details: rear yard, rear area, exposure 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND AT EXPOSURE #4 LARGE CRACK/OPENING OF ADJACENT PROPERTY REAR YARD THAT WAS CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION, WHICH ALLOWED WATER TO ENTER

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 8, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND AT EXPOSURE #4 LARGE CRACK/OPENING OF ADJACENT PROPERTY REAR YARD THAT WAS CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION, WHICH ALLOWED WATER TO ENTER.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Violation 2

Summons 39558866R — Construction fence / site protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558866R
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or noncompliant condition involving the construction fence or site perimeter. The inspector's description specifically references construction fence and exposure 2.

Specific record details: construction fence, exposure 2.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND AT EXPOSURE # 2 AND 4 CONSTRUCTION FENCE THAT WAS NOT MAINTAINED AS PER CODE, FENCE WAS BULGING OUTWARDS AT VARIOUS PLACES AND LOOSE IN DA

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 8, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 211 — BC 3307.7,27-1021(C) JOB SITE FENCE NOT CONSTRUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND AT EXPOSURE # 2 AND 4 CONSTRUCTION FENCE THAT WAS NOT MAINTAINED AS PER CODE, FENCE WAS BULGING OUTWARDS AT VARIOUS PLACES AND LOOSE IN DA.

What this violation means

The summons concerns a construction or job-site fence that DOB says was missing, damaged, improperly configured, encroaching, or otherwise noncompliant.

What may be required to correct the condition

The fence should be brought into conformity with the applicable approved site-protection plan and code requirements. Depending on the condition, this may involve replacing panels, correcting alignment/height, restoring viewing panels, securing the fence or clearing pedestrian encroachment.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Relevant evidence includes site photographs, approved site-protection drawings, permit information, inspection logs and records showing when the fence was repaired.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm the exact exposure/location, the approved fence configuration, whether the cited defect existed at the time, and whether a later repair or changed site condition is documented.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-protection/construction-fence drawings
  • dated photographs
  • site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • reinspection records
Violation 3

Summons 39558867Z — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558867Z
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references rear yard, rear area, front area, second floor and exposure 4.

Specific record details: rear yard, rear area, front area, second floor, exposure 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION, I OBSERVED NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, BUILDING AT 2ND FLOOR LEVEL AND THERE WERE NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY AT EXPOSURE #4 FRONT AND REAR YARD, FAILURE TO PROVID

Issue date
September 8, 2026
Served date
September 8, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P3

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, BUILDING AT 2ND FLOOR LEVEL AND THERE WERE NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY AT EXPOSURE #4 FRONT AND REAR YARD, FAILURE TO PROVID.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 3116 Garage Avenue I, Brooklyn, NY 11210

For 3116 Garage Avenue I, Brooklyn, NY 11210, the current source extract points to construction-site safety, construction fence / site protection, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.