November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

323-325 Eckford Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 5 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 323-325 Eckford Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222. The source records identify dob/oath code-compliance issue, construction fence / site protection, work without a permit and a hearing date of November 6, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

DOB/OATH code-compliance issueConstruction fence / site protectionWork without a permit

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
323-325 Eckford Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3429766
BBL
3025750009 (3/2575/9)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
5
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 6, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39547105Z
Normalized: 039547105Z
November 6, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39547106K
Normalized: 039547106K
November 6, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39549796X
Normalized: 039549796X
November 6, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Construction fence / site protection
39549797H
Normalized: 039549797H
November 6, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39549798J
Normalized: 039549798J
November 6, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Work without a permit

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 5 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39547105Z — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039547105Z
OATH hearingNovember 6, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued November 18, 2025.

Full violation description from the source extract

IVAN BOSTON STATED TO BE THE DESIGNATED COMPETENT PERSON, UPON VERIFICATION SST CARD, CARD WITH MULTIPLE EXPIRED REQUIRED/ MANDATORY CLASSES. CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT NOT PRESENT, ALTERNATE CS NOR ALTERNATE

Issue date
November 18, 2025
Served date
November 18, 2025
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1K6 — BC 3321.1 FAILURE TO ENSURE EACH WORKER HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE REQUIRED

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning ivan boston stated to be the designated competent person, upon verification sst card, card with multiple expired required/ mandatory classes. construction superintendent not present, alternate cs nor alternate.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 2

Summons 39547106K — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039547106K
OATH hearingNovember 6, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition. The inspector's description specifically references excavation.

Specific record details: excavation.

Full violation description from the source extract

CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO ENSURE THAT COMPETENT PERSON ON DAILY LOG BOOK FOR 11-18-2025 HAD VALID SST CARD, JOBSITE @ SOE/ EXCAVATION PHASE W/OUT PLANS, SOE, DAMAGES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND PEDE

Issue date
November 18, 2025
Served date
November 18, 2025
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THROUGH BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning construction superintendent failed to ensure that competent person on daily log book for 11-18-2025 had valid sst card, jobsite @ soe/ excavation phase w/out plans, soe, damages to adjacent properties, and pede.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 3

Summons 39549796X — Construction fence / site protection

Normalized lookup key: 039549796X
OATH hearingNovember 6, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or noncompliant condition involving the construction fence or site perimeter. The inspector's description specifically references construction fence.

Specific record details: construction fence.

Full violation description from the source extract

JOBSITE FENCE NOT MAINTAINED AS PER 3307.7. FENCE @EXPO1 DISLODGING ONTO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY,AT RISK OF FALLING ON PUBLIC.PUT PUBLIC AT RISK OF TRIPPING,FALLING,RUNNING INTO FENCE. @EXPO1&4 EXCESSIVE ADS POSTED

Issue date
February 1, 2026
Served date
February 1, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning jobsite fence not maintained as per 3307.7. fence @expo1 dislodging onto pedestrian walkway,at risk of falling on public.put public at risk of tripping,falling,running into fence. @expo1&4 excessive ads posted.

What this violation means

The summons concerns a construction or job-site fence that DOB says was missing, damaged, improperly configured, encroaching, or otherwise noncompliant.

What may be required to correct the condition

The fence should be brought into conformity with the applicable approved site-protection plan and code requirements. Depending on the condition, this may involve replacing panels, correcting alignment/height, restoring viewing panels, securing the fence or clearing pedestrian encroachment.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Relevant evidence includes site photographs, approved site-protection drawings, permit information, inspection logs and records showing when the fence was repaired.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm the exact exposure/location, the approved fence configuration, whether the cited defect existed at the time, and whether a later repair or changed site condition is documented.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-protection/construction-fence drawings
  • dated photographs
  • site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • reinspection records
Violation 4

Summons 39549797H — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039549797H
OATH hearingNovember 6, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued February 1, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVED CLOSED 3STORY NB. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS BEING USED @EXPOS1&4 NOT UP TO CODE. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY IS NOT MINIMUM OF 5FT AS REQUIRED BY DOT STIPULATIONS, UNCLEARED SNOW IS HAZARDOUS,YODOCKS NOT CONNECTED TO

Issue date
February 1, 2026
Served date
February 1, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2N8

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed closed 3story nb. pedestrian walkways being used @expos1&4 not up to code. pedestrian walkway is not minimum of 5ft as required by dot stipulations, uncleared snow is hazardous,yodocks not connected to.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 5

Summons 39549798J — Work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039549798J
OATH hearingNovember 6, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that construction or alteration work was performed without the required permit.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued February 1, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVED PROPOSED 3STORY NB WITH PUMP-JACK SCAFFOLDS INSTALLED W/OUT ACTIVE PERMIT. PUMP-JACK SCAFFOLDS ARE INSTALLED @EXPOS1&4 AND SURPASSING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, POSTS OF PUMPJACK HIGHER THAN 40FT. UPO

Issue date
February 1, 2026
Served date
February 1, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2L1 — 28-105.1 FAILURE TO OBTAIN A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO INSTALLATIO

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed proposed 3story nb with pump-jack scaffolds installed w/out active permit. pump-jack scaffolds are installed @expos1&4 and surpassing the height of the building, posts of pumpjack higher than 40ft. upo.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that construction or alteration work occurred without the permit required for that scope. The key resolution question is whether the current condition can be legalized, is already covered by an existing approval, or must be restored/removed.

What may be required to correct the condition

Research the permit and approved-plan history before choosing a cure. If the work can legally remain, a registered architect or professional engineer may need to prepare or amend drawings and coordinate permits; licensed trades may be required for regulated work. If legalization is not viable, restoration to an approved condition may be the faster path.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the actual scope observed, the permit record in effect on the inspection date, whether the cited work matches an approved filing, who was responsible for the work, and any photographs or records showing the condition before or after correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Compare the inspector's description to the approved plans and permit scope, determine when the work was performed, and verify whether the work was exempt, previously approved, or later legalized. None of those possibilities should be assumed without records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB permit/application history
  • approved plans and amendments
  • photographs of the cited work
  • contracts, invoices and contractor records
  • proof of restoration/legalization and any inspection or sign-off records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 323-325 Eckford Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222

For 323-325 Eckford Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222, the current source extract points to dob/oath code-compliance issue, construction fence / site protection, work without a permit. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.