(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

341 Garage Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY 11226 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 8 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 341 Garage Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY 11226. The source records identify dob/oath code-compliance issue, construction-site safety, construction housekeeping / debris and hearing dates on November 16, 2026 and November 18, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

DOB/OATH code-compliance issueConstruction-site safetyConstruction housekeeping / debrisSidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
341 Garage Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY 11226
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3107778
BBL
3048370075 (3/4837/75)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
8
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 16, 2026, November 18, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39555884R
Normalized: 039555884R		 November 16, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39555885Z
Normalized: 039555885Z		 November 16, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39559149Z
Normalized: 039559149Z		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Construction-site safety
39559150X
Normalized: 039559150X		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Construction housekeeping / debris
39559151H
Normalized: 039559151H		 November 18, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39559155P
Normalized: 039559155P		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39559156R
Normalized: 039559156R		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39559157Z
Normalized: 039559157Z		 November 18, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Construction-site safety

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 8 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39555884R — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039555884R
OATH hearingNovember 16, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition. The inspector's description specifically references exposure 1.

Specific record details: exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS. AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING AT 3 FLOOR DECKING LEVEL, I OBSERVED ON STREET 1 LARGE GENERATOR AT EXPOSURE #1. UPON REQUEST FOR DOT PERMIT NONE WAS PROVIDED OR AT

Issue date
June 25, 2026
Served date
July 9, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed ON STREET 1 LARGE GENERATOR AT EXPOSURE #1. UPON REQUEST FOR DOT PERMIT NONE WAS PROVIDED OR AT.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 2

Summons 39555885Z — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039555885Z
OATH hearingNovember 16, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition. The inspector's description specifically references front area and exposure 1.

Specific record details: front area, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS. AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY BUILDING, AT 3 FLOOR DECKING LEVEL, I OBSERVED ON STREET CONCRETE WASH OUT BOX IN FRONT 339 LENOX ROAD EXPOSURE #1. UPON REVIEW OF THE DOT PER

Issue date
June 25, 2026
Served date
July 9, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed ON STREET CONCRETE WASH OUT BOX IN FRONT 339 LENOX ROAD EXPOSURE #1. UPON REVIEW OF THE DOT PER.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 3

Summons 39559149Z — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039559149Z
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 14, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

RESPONDING TO THE INCIDENT IN WHICH A WORKER WAS STRUCK BY A CHANNEL BEAM, INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT TWO WORKERS WERE PUSHING AN A-FRAME DOLLY WITH TWO CHANNEL BEAMS,DOLLY SLIPPED BECAUSE OF LIQUID SUBSTANCE

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning responding to the incident in which a worker was struck by a channel beam, investigation revealed that two workers were pushing an a-frame dolly with two channel beams,dolly slipped because of liquid substance.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Violation 4

Summons 39559150X — Construction housekeeping / debris

Normalized lookup key: 039559150X
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a debris or site-housekeeping condition.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 1, issued September 14, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

RESPONDING TO THE INCIDENT IN WHICH A WORKER WAS STRUCK BY A CHANNEL BEAM, INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT TWO WORKERS WERE PUSHING AN A-FRAME DOLLY WITH TWO CHANNEL BEAMS,DOLLY SLIPPED BECAUSE OF LIQUID SUBSTANCE

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning responding to the incident in which a worker was struck by a channel beam, investigation revealed that two workers were pushing an a-frame dolly with two channel beams,dolly slipped because of liquid substance.

What this violation means

The summons concerns debris, rubbish or construction housekeeping that DOB says created a code or safety problem at the site.

What may be required to correct the condition

Remove the cited debris/obstruction, restore safe housekeeping and confirm that storage/disposal practices meet the applicable site-safety rules. If the debris is tied to active construction, contractor/site-safety procedures may need to be adjusted.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Photographs, site logs, hauling/disposal records and evidence showing when the condition was corrected can be useful, especially where the issue was temporary.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm the exact location, amount/type of material, whether it obstructed access or created another hazard, and how quickly it was removed.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • dated photographs
  • site-safety or housekeeping logs
  • hauling/disposal receipts
  • contractor records
  • proof of correction
Violation 5

Summons 39559151H — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039559151H
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued September 14, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

RESPONDING TO THE INCIDENT IN WHICH A WORKER WAS STRUCK BY A CHANNEL BEAM, INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT TWO WORKERS WERE PUSHING AN A-FRAME DOLLY WITH TWO CHANNEL BEAMS, DOLLY SLIPPED BECAUSE OF LIQUID SUBSTANCE

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning responding to the incident in which a worker was struck by a channel beam, investigation revealed that two workers were pushing an a-frame dolly with two channel beams, dolly slipped because of liquid substance.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 6

Summons 39559155P — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559155P
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED BAKERS SCAFFOLD AT THE 8TH FLOOR WITH NO OUT RIGGERS TO PREVENT IT FROM FALLING. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN BAKERS SCAFFOLD AS PER MANUFAC

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed BAKERS SCAFFOLD AT THE 8TH FLOOR WITH NO OUT RIGGERS TO PREVENT IT FROM FALLING. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN BAKERS SCAFFOLD AS PER MANUFAC.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 7

Summons 39559156R — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039559156R
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition. The inspector's description specifically references exposure 1.

Specific record details: exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

15 RCNY 20-08(D) AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED FIRE HYDRANT AT EXPOSURE #1 ACROSS THE STREET WITH WATER HOSE CONNECT TO IT AND THERE WERE NO BACKFLOW VALVE INSTALL TO IT, AL

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed FIRE HYDRANT AT EXPOSURE #1 ACROSS THE STREET WITH WATER HOSE CONNECT TO IT AND THERE WERE NO BACKFLOW VALVE INSTALL TO IT, AL.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 8

Summons 39559157Z — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039559157Z
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 14, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION OF A 9 STORY NEW BUILDING, I OBSERVED WORKERS STANDING ON TOP OF 2 PAINT BUCKETS COVERING WINDOWS WITH PLASTIC, FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SAFETY MEASURES FOR WORKERS

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 209 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAIL TO SAFEGUARD PERS/PROPERTY AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION OP
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed WORKERS STANDING ON TOP OF 2 PAINT BUCKETS COVERING WINDOWS WITH PLASTIC, FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SAFETY MEASURES FOR WORKERS.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 341 Garage Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY 11226

For 341 Garage Lenox Road, Brooklyn, NY 11226, the current source extract points to dob/oath code-compliance issue, construction-site safety, construction housekeeping / debris. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages