(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

38-29 30 Street, Queens, NY 11101 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 5 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 38-29 30 Street, Queens, NY 11101. The source records identify sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, construction-site safety and a hearing date of November 5, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protectionConstruction-site safety

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
38-29 30 Street, Queens, NY 11101
Borough
Queens
BIN
4004604
BBL
4003830001 (4/383/1)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
5
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 5, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39532842R
Normalized: 039532842R		 November 5, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39532843Z
Normalized: 039532843Z		 November 5, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Construction-site safety
39532845M
Normalized: 039532845M		 November 5, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Construction-site safety
39532848H
Normalized: 039532848H		 November 5, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39532899H
Normalized: 039532899H		 November 5, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

How the summonses fit together at this property

These summonses form a construction-site compliance cluster rather than a single generic violation. They address different safety, temporary-protection, approved-plan or work-control obligations at the same property. Site records should be organized by inspection date and cited condition so the correction and hearing response for one summons is not mistakenly used for another.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39532842R — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039532842R
OATH hearingNovember 5, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references railing/guard condition, debris/housekeeping, scaffold/shoring and exposure 3.

Specific record details: railing/guard condition, debris/housekeeping, scaffold/shoring, exposure 3.

Full violation description from the source extract

BC 3314.1 UNSAFE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD. OBSERVE 5 FRAME HIGH SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD AT EXP#3-4 PLATFORM NOT FULL DECKED NOR TIED DOWN&INADEQUATELY SUPPORTED(BRIDGED), GUARDRAIL&DEBRIS NET NOT MAINTAINED,MISSING TIE-IN

Issue date
June 6, 2024
Served date
September 30, 2024
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning bc 3314.1 unsafe supported scaffold. observe 5 frame high supported scaffold at exp#3-4 platform not full decked nor tied down&inadequately supported(bridged), guardrail&debris net not maintained,missing tie-in.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 2

Summons 39532843Z — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039532843Z
OATH hearingNovember 5, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued June 6, 2024.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING FATALITY FOLLOW UP INSPECTION I REQUESTED SITE PERSONNEL (GC,COMPETENT PERSON,&SUPERINTEDENT) FOR DAILY SITE SAFETY TRAINING LOG (BC3321.2(4)) TO REQUIREMENTS OF BC3321.2(3) COPY OF THE SST CARD, SST SUP

Issue date
June 6, 2024
Served date
September 30, 2024
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1K5 — BC 3321.2.3 FAILURE TO HAVE OR MAINTAIN THE REQUIRED DAILY LOG
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning during fatality follow up inspection i requested site personnel (gc,competent person,&superintedent) for daily site safety training log (bc3321.2(4)) to requirements of bc3321.2(3) copy of the sst card, sst sup.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Violation 3

Summons 39532845M — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039532845M
OATH hearingNovember 5, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued June 6, 2024.

Full violation description from the source extract

INADEQUATE SITE SAFETY ORIENTATION BC3301.11. DURING FATALITY FOLLOW UP INSPECTION, PERSONNEL PROVIDED NONE CODE COMPLIANT ORIENTATION DOCS-ILLEGIBLE NAMES, MISSING TITLES,INCORRECT COMPANY AFFILIATION, MISSING

Issue date
June 6, 2024
Served date
September 30, 2024
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning inadequate site safety orientation bc3301.11. during fatality follow up inspection, personnel provided none code compliant orientation docs-illegible names, missing titles,incorrect company affiliation, missing.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Violation 4

Summons 39532848H — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039532848H
OATH hearingNovember 5, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring and exposure 4.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring, exposure 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

WORK NOT ADHERE TO SITE SAFETY PLAN 28-105.12.8. DURING FOLLOW UP INSPECTION FOR FATALITY OBSERVE OVERHEAD PROTECTIONS NOT IN PLACE@EXPOSURE#4 TO SSP&ERECTED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD@EXPOSURE#4 NOT INDICATED ON SITE

Issue date
June 6, 2024
Served date
September 30, 2024
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 106 — 27-/28-/BC-MISC MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning work not adhere to site safety plan 28-105.12.8. during follow up inspection for fatality observe overhead protections not in place@exposure#4 to ssp&erected supported scaffold@exposure#4 not indicated on site.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 5

Summons 39532899H — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039532899H
OATH hearingNovember 5, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references roof, electrical wiring/equipment, debris/housekeeping, scaffold/shoring and exposure 3, 4.

Specific record details: roof, electrical wiring/equipment, debris/housekeeping, scaffold/shoring, exposure 3, 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVE UNSAFE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD AT EXP#3-4 RESULTED IN FATALITY, MISSING OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR EXP#4 NEIGHBOR PROPERTY,MATERIAL/DEBRIS AT ROOF LEADING EDGES&UNPROTECTED ELECTRICAL WIRING ON EXTERIOR STAIR L

Issue date
June 6, 2024
Served date
September 30, 2024
Source violation type
Site Safety
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1G5 — BC 3301.13.7 THRU BC 3301.13.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT FAILED TO PERFORM DUTIES PER CODE.
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observe unsafe supported scaffold at exp#3-4 resulted in fatality, missing overhead protection for exp#4 neighbor property,material/debris at roof leading edges&unprotected electrical wiring on exterior stair l.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation. Because electrical work is mentioned, any correction plan should separately verify whether licensed electrical work, filing or inspection is required.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 38-29 30 Street, Queens, NY 11101

For 38-29 30 Street, Queens, NY 11101, the current source extract points to sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, construction-site safety. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages