(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

444-450 Carroll Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 8 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 444-450 Carroll Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215. The source records identify work not conforming to approved documents, construction housekeeping / debris, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection and hearing dates on November 18, 2026 and November 25, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Work not conforming to approved documentsConstruction housekeeping / debrisSidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
444-450 Carroll Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3808142
BBL
3004530026 (3/453/26)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
8
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 18, 2026, November 25, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39559094K
Normalized: 039559094K		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39559095M
Normalized: 039559095M		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39559096Y
Normalized: 039559096Y		 November 18, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Construction housekeeping / debris
39559097X
Normalized: 039559097X		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39559099J
Normalized: 039559099J		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Construction housekeeping / debris
39559160J
Normalized: 039559160J		 November 25, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39559161L
Normalized: 039559161L		 November 25, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39559162N
Normalized: 039559162N		 November 25, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

How the summonses fit together at this property

These summonses form a construction-site compliance cluster rather than a single generic violation. They address different safety, temporary-protection, approved-plan or work-control obligations at the same property. Site records should be organized by inspection date and cited condition so the correction and hearing response for one summons is not mistakenly used for another.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39559094K — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039559094K
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring.

Full violation description from the source extract

SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD INSTALLED IN COURTYARD CONTRARY TO PLANS-FIRST ROW USING 5' FRAME THEN 2' FRAME ON TOP -NOT ON PLANS,USING CLAMPS FOR CROSS BRACING-NOT ON PLANS,CONFIGURATION OF FRAMES ON BALCONIES NOT AS ON

Issue date
September 11, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning supported scaffold installed in courtyard contrary to plans-first row using 5' frame then 2' frame on top -not on plans,using clamps for cross bracing-not on plans,configuration of frames on balconies not as on.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 2

Summons 39559095M — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039559095M
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring and exposure 2.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring, exposure 2.

Full violation description from the source extract

OBSERVED NEEDLE BEAMS WITH 3.5' SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD INSTALLED AT 4TH FL-EXP#2 CONTRARY TO PLANS -BEAMS NOT ATTACHED TO SLAB WITH ANGLES/BOLTS THROUGH SLAB,NO STEEL PLATES ANCHORED TO SLAB -STOP ALL USE OF NEEDL

Issue date
September 11, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed needle beams with 3.5' supported scaffold installed at 4th fl-exp#2 contrary to plans -beams not attached to slab with angles/bolts through slab,no steel plates anchored to slab -stop all use of needl.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 3

Summons 39559096Y — Construction housekeeping / debris

Normalized lookup key: 039559096Y
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a debris or site-housekeeping condition. The inspector's description specifically references railing/guard condition and debris/housekeeping.

Specific record details: railing/guard condition, debris/housekeeping.

Full violation description from the source extract

BC 3308.7-GUARDRAIL SYSTEM-OBSERVED INADEQUATE GUARDRAIL SYSTEM ON WINDOWS OPENING THROUGH OUT WHOLE BUILDING-ALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM MISSING/NOT INSTALLED TOE BOARD AS REQUIRED(DEBRIS VISIBLE BEHIND ON BALCONIES)

Issue date
September 11, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning bc 3308.7-guardrail system-observed inadequate guardrail system on windows opening through out whole building-all guardrail system missing/not installed toe board as required(debris visible behind on balconies).

What this violation means

The summons concerns debris, rubbish or construction housekeeping that DOB says created a code or safety problem at the site.

What may be required to correct the condition

Remove the cited debris/obstruction, restore safe housekeeping and confirm that storage/disposal practices meet the applicable site-safety rules. If the debris is tied to active construction, contractor/site-safety procedures may need to be adjusted.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Photographs, site logs, hauling/disposal records and evidence showing when the condition was corrected can be useful, especially where the issue was temporary.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm the exact location, amount/type of material, whether it obstructed access or created another hazard, and how quickly it was removed.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • dated photographs
  • site-safety or housekeeping logs
  • hauling/disposal receipts
  • contractor records
  • proof of correction
Violation 4

Summons 39559097X — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559097X
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring and exposure 4.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring, exposure 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

OSUPPORTED SCAFFOLD INSTALLED AT EXP#4 APPROX. 2 FEET FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY WINDOWS(436 CARROLL STR) -SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD NET ON SIDE WAS NOT TIED ADEQUATELY/LOOSE , PLATFORM(PLANKS) CLOSE TO WINDOWS,NO TOE BO

Issue date
September 11, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P5
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning osupported scaffold installed at exp#4 approx. 2 feet from adjoining property windows(436 carroll str) -supported scaffold net on side was not tied adequately/loose , platform(planks) close to windows,no toe bo.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 5

Summons 39559099J — Construction housekeeping / debris

Normalized lookup key: 039559099J
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a debris or site-housekeeping condition. The inspector's description specifically references debris/housekeeping.

Specific record details: debris/housekeeping.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF MY INSPECTION I OBSERVED VERY BIG AMOUNT/PILES OF GARBAGE/DEBRIS ACCUMULATED IN COURTYARD WITH WORKERS WORKING AROUND IT/WALKING THROUGH IT-MAKING IN HAZARDOUS FALL/FIRE CONDITIONS

Issue date
September 11, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed VERY BIG AMOUNT/PILES OF GARBAGE/DEBRIS ACCUMULATED IN COURTYARD WITH WORKERS WORKING AROUND IT/WALKING THROUGH IT-MAKING IN HAZARDOUS FALL/FIRE CONDITIONS.

What this violation means

The summons concerns debris, rubbish or construction housekeeping that DOB says created a code or safety problem at the site.

What may be required to correct the condition

Remove the cited debris/obstruction, restore safe housekeeping and confirm that storage/disposal practices meet the applicable site-safety rules. If the debris is tied to active construction, contractor/site-safety procedures may need to be adjusted.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Photographs, site logs, hauling/disposal records and evidence showing when the condition was corrected can be useful, especially where the issue was temporary.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm the exact location, amount/type of material, whether it obstructed access or created another hazard, and how quickly it was removed.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • dated photographs
  • site-safety or housekeeping logs
  • hauling/disposal receipts
  • contractor records
  • proof of correction
Violation 6

Summons 39559160J — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559160J
OATH hearingNovember 25, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION SIX-STORY NEW BUILDING I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #1, ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK SHED MATERIALS STORED ON STREET AND DELIVERY TRUCK. THERE WAS NO 4 FEET SOLID BARRIER FROM GROUND LEVEL WITH 18 G

Issue date
September 15, 2026
Served date
September 15, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed AT EXPOSURE #1, ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK SHED MATERIALS STORED ON STREET AND DELIVERY TRUCK. THERE WAS NO 4 FEET SOLID BARRIER FROM GROUND LEVEL WITH 18 G.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 7

Summons 39559161L — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559161L
OATH hearingNovember 25, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references scaffold/shoring.

Specific record details: scaffold/shoring.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION SIX-STORY NEW BUILDING I OBSERVED BAKER SCAFFOLD ON SITE AT VARIOUS LOCATION WITHOUT OUTRIGGERS TO PREVENT IT FROM FALLING. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN THE BAKER'S SCAFFOLD IN ACCO

Issue date
September 15, 2026
Served date
September 15, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed BAKER SCAFFOLD ON SITE AT VARIOUS LOCATION WITHOUT OUTRIGGERS TO PREVENT IT FROM FALLING. FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN THE BAKER'S SCAFFOLD IN ACCO.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 8

Summons 39559162N — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559162N
OATH hearingNovember 25, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references exposure 4.

Specific record details: exposure 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION SIX-STORY NEW BUILDING I OBSERVED AT EXPOSURE #4 NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY'S BALCONY. FACADE INCOMPLETE. FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERHEAD PROTECTION CREATES HAZARD FOR PU

Issue date
September 15, 2026
Served date
September 15, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P3
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed AT EXPOSURE #4 NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY'S BALCONY. FACADE INCOMPLETE. FAILURE TO PROVIDE OVERHEAD PROTECTION CREATES HAZARD FOR PU.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 444-450 Carroll Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215

For 444-450 Carroll Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215, the current source extract points to work not conforming to approved documents, construction housekeeping / debris, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages