November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

64 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 4 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 64 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206. The source records identify work without a permit, work not conforming to approved documents, construction housekeeping / debris and a hearing date of November 4, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Work without a permitWork not conforming to approved documentsConstruction housekeeping / debrisConstruction-site safety

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
64 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3325814
BBL
3030500008 (3/3050/8)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
4
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 4, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558356R
Normalized: 039558356R
November 4, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Work without a permit
39558370N
Normalized: 039558370N
November 4, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Work not conforming to approved documents
39558371P
Normalized: 039558371P
November 4, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Construction housekeeping / debris
39558372R
Normalized: 039558372R
November 4, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Construction-site safety

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 4 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558356R — Work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039558356R
OATH hearingNovember 4, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that construction or alteration work was performed without the required permit.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 1, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED ACTIVE DEMOLITION WORK BEING PERFORMED WITHOUT A VALID PERMIT. DEMOLITION PERMIT B01358066-I1-FD EXPIRED ON 08/16/2026, CONTRARY TO AC 28-105.1. STOP ALL WORK ENTIRE SITE. ALLOWE

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED ACTIVE DEMOLITION WORK BEING PERFORMED WITHOUT A VALID PERMIT. DEMOLITION PERMIT B01358066-I1-FD EXPIRED ON 08/16/2026, CONTRARY TO AC 28-105.1. STOP ALL WORK ENTIRE SITE. ALLOWE.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that construction or alteration work occurred without the permit required for that scope. The key resolution question is whether the current condition can be legalized, is already covered by an existing approval, or must be restored/removed.

What may be required to correct the condition

Research the permit and approved-plan history before choosing a cure. If the work can legally remain, a registered architect or professional engineer may need to prepare or amend drawings and coordinate permits; licensed trades may be required for regulated work. If legalization is not viable, restoration to an approved condition may be the faster path.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the actual scope observed, the permit record in effect on the inspection date, whether the cited work matches an approved filing, who was responsible for the work, and any photographs or records showing the condition before or after correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Compare the inspector's description to the approved plans and permit scope, determine when the work was performed, and verify whether the work was exempt, previously approved, or later legalized. None of those possibilities should be assumed without records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB permit/application history
  • approved plans and amendments
  • photographs of the cited work
  • contracts, invoices and contractor records
  • proof of restoration/legalization and any inspection or sign-off records
Violation 2

Summons 39558370N — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558370N
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 1, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED BUILDINGS B AND C HAD BEEN FULLY DEMOLISHED WHILE BUILDING A REMAINED, CONTRARY TO THE APPROVED DEMOLITION SEQUENCE REQUIRING BUILDINGS A, B, AND C TO BE DEMOLISHED SIMULTANEOUSL

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED BUILDINGS B AND C HAD BEEN FULLY DEMOLISHED WHILE BUILDING A REMAINED, CONTRARY TO THE APPROVED DEMOLITION SEQUENCE REQUIRING BUILDINGS A, B, AND C TO BE DEMOLISHED SIMULTANEOUSL.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 3

Summons 39558371P — Construction housekeeping / debris

Normalized lookup key: 039558371P
OATH hearingNovember 4, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a debris or site-housekeeping condition. The inspector's description specifically references debris/housekeeping.

Specific record details: debris/housekeeping.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM THE PRIOR WORKDAY REMAINED ON SITE AND WAS NOT PROMPTLY REMOVED. THIS CONDITION CREATED TRIPPING, AND FALLING-MATERIAL HAZARDS CONTRARY TO BC 3303.4. MAINT

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 181 — BC 3303.4 & 27-1018 FAILURE TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE HOUSEKEEPING PER SECTION REQUIREMENTS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM THE PRIOR WORKDAY REMAINED ON SITE AND WAS NOT PROMPTLY REMOVED. THIS CONDITION CREATED TRIPPING, AND FALLING-MATERIAL HAZARDS CONTRARY TO BC 3303.4. MAINT.

What this violation means

The summons concerns debris, rubbish or construction housekeeping that DOB says created a code or safety problem at the site.

What may be required to correct the condition

Remove the cited debris/obstruction, restore safe housekeeping and confirm that storage/disposal practices meet the applicable site-safety rules. If the debris is tied to active construction, contractor/site-safety procedures may need to be adjusted.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Photographs, site logs, hauling/disposal records and evidence showing when the condition was corrected can be useful, especially where the issue was temporary.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm the exact location, amount/type of material, whether it obstructed access or created another hazard, and how quickly it was removed.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • dated photographs
  • site-safety or housekeeping logs
  • hauling/disposal receipts
  • contractor records
  • proof of correction
Violation 4

Summons 39558372R — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039558372R
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED A MACHINE IN USE ON SITE THAT WAS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE APPROVED SITE SAFETY PLAN. REQUIRED DETAILS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WERE NOT PROVIDED, CONTRARY TO AC 28-110.

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2Q1

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED A MACHINE IN USE ON SITE THAT WAS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE APPROVED SITE SAFETY PLAN. REQUIRED DETAILS FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT WERE NOT PROVIDED, CONTRARY TO AC 28-110.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 64 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206

For 64 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206, the current source extract points to work without a permit, work not conforming to approved documents, construction housekeeping / debris. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.