(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

66 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 7 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 66 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206. The source records identify dob/oath code-compliance issue, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, construction-site safety and a hearing date of November 4, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

DOB/OATH code-compliance issueSidewalk shed / temporary construction protectionConstruction-site safetyWork not conforming to approved documents

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
66 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3325815
BBL
3030500008 (3/3050/8)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
7
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 4, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558343H
Normalized: 039558343H		 November 4, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558344J
Normalized: 039558344J		 November 4, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39558345L
Normalized: 039558345L		 November 4, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Construction-site safety
39558346N
Normalized: 039558346N		 November 4, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39558347P
Normalized: 039558347P		 November 4, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558354N
Normalized: 039558354N		 November 4, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558355P
Normalized: 039558355P		 November 4, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 Work not conforming to approved documents

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 7 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558343H — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558343H
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, REVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION-SUPERINTENDENT LOG DETERMINED THAT AN ALTERNATE ACTED IN PLACE OF THE PRIMARY FOR MORE THAN TWO CONSECUTIVE WEEKS WITHOUT BEING DESIGNATED BY THE PERMIT HOLDER.

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection REVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION-SUPERINTENDENT LOG DETERMINED THAT AN ALTERNATE ACTED IN PLACE OF THE PRIMARY FOR MORE THAN TWO CONSECUTIVE WEEKS WITHOUT BEING DESIGNATED BY THE PERMIT HOLDER.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 2

Summons 39558344J — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558344J
OATH hearingNovember 4, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references railing/guard condition and scaffold/shoring.

Specific record details: railing/guard condition, scaffold/shoring.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED THE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD WAS NOT MAINTAINED, WITH AN INADEQUATE GUARDRAIL SYSTEM AND PLATFORMS THAT WERE NOT FULLY PLANKED. THESE CONDITIONS CREATES A FALL HAZARD, CONTRARY TO BC 3

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED THE SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD WAS NOT MAINTAINED, WITH AN INADEQUATE GUARDRAIL SYSTEM AND PLATFORMS THAT WERE NOT FULLY PLANKED. THESE CONDITIONS CREATES A FALL HAZARD, CONTRARY TO BC 3.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 3

Summons 39558345L — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039558345L
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED A MACHINE ON SITE. REVIEW OF THE SITE SAFETY PLAN FOUND NO DETAILS IDENTIFYING THE MACHINE OR ITS LOCATION AND OPERATION. THE REQUIRED SITE SAFETY PLAN INFORMATION FOR TEMPORARY

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2Q1
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED A MACHINE ON SITE. REVIEW OF THE SITE SAFETY PLAN FOUND NO DETAILS IDENTIFYING THE MACHINE OR ITS LOCATION AND OPERATION. THE REQUIRED SITE SAFETY PLAN INFORMATION FOR TEMPORARY.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Violation 4

Summons 39558346N — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558346N
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references debris/housekeeping and exposure 2.

Specific record details: debris/housekeeping, exposure 2.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE DEMOLITION SITE, OBSERVED NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION AT EXPOSURE 2 TO PROTECT THE ADJOINING PROPERTY FROM FALLING MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THIS CONDITION EXPOSED THE ADJOINING PROPERT

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P3
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OF AN ACTIVE DEMOLITION SITE, OBSERVED NO OVERHEAD PROTECTION AT EXPOSURE 2 TO PROTECT THE ADJOINING PROPERTY FROM FALLING MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THIS CONDITION EXPOSED THE ADJOINING PROPERT.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 5

Summons 39558347P — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558347P
OATH hearingNovember 4, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE DEMOLITION SITE, OBSERVED GLASS REMAINED THROUGHOUT AREAS UNDERGOING DEMOLITION. GLASS WAS NOT REMOVED BEFORE DEMOLITION OPERATIONS COMMENCED, CONTRARY TO BC 3306.9.8.3. STOP

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OF AN ACTIVE DEMOLITION SITE, OBSERVED GLASS REMAINED THROUGHOUT AREAS UNDERGOING DEMOLITION. GLASS WAS NOT REMOVED BEFORE DEMOLITION OPERATIONS COMMENCED, CONTRARY TO BC 3306.9.8.3. STOP.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 6

Summons 39558354N — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558354N
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED THE WORK/STORAGE ZONE ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK WAS NOT SECURED AND REMAINED ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC FROM THE SIDEWALK SIDE. THIS CONDITION EXPOSED PEDESTRIANS TO CONSTRUCTION MA

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED THE WORK/STORAGE ZONE ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK WAS NOT SECURED AND REMAINED ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC FROM THE SIDEWALK SIDE. THIS CONDITION EXPOSED PEDESTRIANS TO CONSTRUCTION MA.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 7

Summons 39558355P — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558355P
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 1, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED BUILDINGS B AND C HAD BEEN FULLY DEMOLISHED WHILE BUILDING A REMAINED, CONTRARY TO THE APPROVED DEMOLITION SEQUENCE REQUIRING BUILDINGS A, B, AND C TO BE DEMOLISHED SIMULTANEOUSL

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 182 — 28-105.12.2 WORK DOES NOT CONFORM TO APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND/OR APPROV
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED BUILDINGS B AND C HAD BEEN FULLY DEMOLISHED WHILE BUILDING A REMAINED, CONTRARY TO THE APPROVED DEMOLITION SEQUENCE REQUIRING BUILDINGS A, B, AND C TO BE DEMOLISHED SIMULTANEOUSL.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 66 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206

For 66 Meserole Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206, the current source extract points to dob/oath code-compliance issue, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection, construction-site safety. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages