(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

661 Bushwick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11221 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 9 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 661 Bushwick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11221. The source records identify dob/oath code-compliance issue, work not conforming to approved documents, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection and a hearing date of November 18, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

DOB/OATH code-compliance issueWork not conforming to approved documentsSidewalk shed / temporary construction protectionConstruction-site safety

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
661 Bushwick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11221
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3428696
BBL
3031830071 (3/3183/71)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
9
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 18, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558695L
Normalized: 039558695L		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558696N
Normalized: 039558696N		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558697P
Normalized: 039558697P		 November 18, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558750P
Normalized: 039558750P		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39558767L
Normalized: 039558767L		 November 18, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39558774J
Normalized: 039558774J		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39559101J
Normalized: 039559101J		 November 18, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection
39559102L
Normalized: 039559102L		 November 18, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39559103N
Normalized: 039559103N		 November 18, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Construction-site safety

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 9 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. Several descriptions point to the same area (sidewalk shed), which is a sign the summonses may be factually connected. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558695L — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558695L
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING INSPECTION OF A PROPOSED 11 STORY BUILDING WHILE WALKING UP AND DOWN THE FLOOR, I OBSERVED THAT THERE WAS NO FLOOR SIGNAGE ON ANY OF THE FLOORS. FLOOR SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED TO BE IN PLACE TO ALLOW WORKERS

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 2, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 235 — 27-393, BC 1019.1.7 (2008 CODE) & BC 1022.8 (2014 CODE) STAIR AND/OR FLOOR IDENTIFICATION SIGNS MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE.
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed THAT THERE WAS NO FLOOR SIGNAGE ON ANY OF THE FLOORS. FLOOR SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED TO BE IN PLACE TO ALLOW WORKERS.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 2

Summons 39558696N — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558696N
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 1, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

3303.4.7 STORAGE NEAR SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, & PATHWAYS: INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE SITE THERE WAS SEVERAL LARGE STACKED MATERIAL FROM 4-7 FEET HIGH IN THE STORAGE WORK ZONE AREA. MATERIAL STORED ADJACENT TO A SIDEW

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 2, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning 3303.4.7 storage near sidewalks, walkways, & pathways: inspection of an active site there was several large stacked material from 4-7 feet high in the storage work zone area. material stored adjacent to a sidew.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 3

Summons 39558697P — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558697P
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Construction, severity CLASS - 1, issued September 2, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

DURING INSPECTION OF AN ACTIVE SITE I OBSERVED SEVERAL WORKERS STANDING ON "A FRAME LADDERS" PERFORMING OVER HEAD WORK AND NOT MAINTAINING THE REQUIRED 3 POINTS OF CONTACT WITH THE LADDER. THE OVER HEAD WORK US

Issue date
September 2, 2026
Served date
September 2, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 1F1 — BC 3301.1.3 (2014 CODE) FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed SEVERAL WORKERS STANDING ON "A FRAME LADDERS" PERFORMING OVER HEAD WORK AND NOT MAINTAINING THE REQUIRED 3 POINTS OF CONTACT WITH THE LADDER. THE OVER HEAD WORK US.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 4

Summons 39558750P — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558750P
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references roof and exposure 4.

Specific record details: roof, exposure 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

UPON REVIEW SITE SAFETY PLAN -PROTECTION CONTRARY TO SSP(ROOF/OVERHEAD PROTECTION) AT EXP#4-SSP PLAN INDICATE ALL ADJ PROPERTY TO BE PROTECTED 20' FROM WORK AREA -OBSERVED PROTECTION INSTALLED APPROX. 12' TO 1

Issue date
September 3, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning upon review site safety plan -protection contrary to ssp(roof/overhead protection) at exp#4-ssp plan indicate all adj property to be protected 20' from work area -observed protection installed approx. 12' to 1.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 5

Summons 39558767L — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558767L
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references brick/masonry condition, scaffold/shoring and exposure 2, 3.

Specific record details: brick/masonry condition, scaffold/shoring, exposure 2, 3.

Full violation description from the source extract

I OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD BEING INSTALLED AT EXP#2/3-CONTRARY TO PLANS-AT EXP#2 FIRST ROW OF FRAMES USED(3'MASONRY FRAMES)-NOT INDICATED ON PLANS(WALK THROUGH FRAMES TO BE USED) -AT EXP#3 THE FOOTINGS OF SC

Issue date
September 3, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD BEING INSTALLED AT EXP#2/3-CONTRARY TO PLANS-AT EXP#2 FIRST ROW OF FRAMES USED(3'MASONRY FRAMES)-NOT INDICATED ON PLANS(WALK THROUGH FRAMES TO BE USED) -AT EXP#3 THE FOOTINGS OF SC.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 6

Summons 39558774J — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558774J
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED AT EXP#1 INSTALLED CONTRARY TO PLANS-MISSING POSTS AT LEFT SIDE CORNER EXP#1/2-ADITIONAL POSTS INSTALLED IN MIDDLE , MISSING CROSS BRACING AT POSTS INSTALLED IN MIDDLE-,STORAGE OF EQUIP

Issue date
September 3, 2026
Served date
September 3, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed SIDEWALK SHED AT EXP#1 INSTALLED CONTRARY TO PLANS-MISSING POSTS AT LEFT SIDE CORNER EXP#1/2-ADITIONAL POSTS INSTALLED IN MIDDLE , MISSING CROSS BRACING AT POSTS INSTALLED IN MIDDLE-,STORAGE OF EQUIP.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 7

Summons 39559101J — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559101J
OATH hearingNovember 18, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed, debris/housekeeping, scaffold/shoring and exposure 2, 4.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, debris/housekeeping, scaffold/shoring, exposure 2, 4.

Full violation description from the source extract

BC3314.1 AT TIME OF INSPECTION OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD INSTALLED ON TOP OF SIDEWALK SHED. SCAFFOLD PLANKS LOOSE NOT TIED DOWN / SECURED. DEBRIS NETTING MISSING AT EXP# 2 AND EXP# 4 NOT FULLY ENCLOSING SCAF

Issue date
September 12, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED SUPPORTED SCAFFOLD INSTALLED ON TOP OF SIDEWALK SHED. SCAFFOLD PLANKS LOOSE NOT TIED DOWN / SECURED. DEBRIS NETTING MISSING AT EXP# 2 AND EXP# 4 NOT FULLY ENCLOSING SCAF.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Violation 8

Summons 39559102L — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039559102L
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 12, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

BC3307.4.7 OBSERVED INADEQUATE WORK AND STORAGE ZONE, MATERIAL AND MACHINERY EQUIPMENT STORED AT WORK & STORAGE ZONE MISSING SECTION 4FT SOLID BARRIERS WITH MESH ON TOP ALONGSIDE THE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION AND J

Issue date
September 12, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning bc3307.4.7 observed inadequate work and storage zone, material and machinery equipment stored at work & storage zone missing section 4ft solid barriers with mesh on top alongside the pedestrian protection and j.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 9

Summons 39559103N — Construction-site safety

Normalized lookup key: 039559103N
OATH hearingNovember 18, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a construction-site safety or safeguarding deficiency.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued September 12, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

BC3303.3 WATCHPERSON 11 STORY NEW BUILDING, BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 6694 SQUARE FEET. SITE CLOSED AND THERE WERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. UPON SHOUTING AT PERIMETER AND BANGING ON FENCE AND DOOR TO ALERT WATCHP

Issue date
September 12, 2026
Served date
September 12, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning bc3303.3 watchperson 11 story new building, building approximately 6694 square feet. site closed and there were no construction activity. upon shouting at perimeter and banging on fence and door to alert watchp.

What this violation means

This summons concerns construction-site safety, safeguarding or required temporary protections/documents. These cases are highly fact-specific because the cited condition usually relates to a particular phase of construction and location.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited safety condition should be corrected immediately and checked against the approved site-safety/temporary-construction documents. Depending on the allegation, the responsible contractor, construction superintendent, site safety manager/coordinator, or design professional may need to document the correction.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Dated site photographs, approved safety drawings, logs, daily reports, permit status and records identifying the construction phase can be important at the hearing.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact construction operation, exposure/location, responsible permit/site-safety roles, and what approved protection was required at the time. Compare the inspector's description with contemporaneous site records.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • site-safety plans and temporary-construction drawings
  • daily logs and inspection reports
  • dated photographs/video
  • permit and superintendent/site-safety records
  • proof of correction/reinspection
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 661 Bushwick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11221

For 661 Bushwick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11221, the current source extract points to dob/oath code-compliance issue, work not conforming to approved documents, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages