(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

675 West 160 Street, Manhattan, NY 10032 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 2 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 675 West 160 Street, Manhattan, NY 10032. The source records identify certificate of correction / compliance filing, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection and hearing dates on November 12, 2026 and November 19, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Certificate of Correction / compliance filingSidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
675 West 160 Street, Manhattan, NY 10032
Borough
Manhattan
BIN
1063326
BBL
1021360106 (1/2136/106)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
2
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 12, 2026, November 19, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39203128M
Normalized: 039203128M		 November 12, 2026
9:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Certificate of Correction / compliance filing
39559144J
Normalized: 039559144J		 November 19, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

How the summonses fit together at this property

At least one summons concerns failure to file or obtain acceptance of a Certificate of Correction. That later compliance issue should be cross-checked against the underlying summons it references; paying or resolving one record does not automatically establish that the other record is closed.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39203128M — Certificate of Correction / compliance filing

Normalized lookup key: 039203128M
OATH hearingNovember 12, 20269:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that a required Certificate of Correction was not filed or accepted for an earlier summons. The inspector's description specifically references Certificate of Correction.

Specific record details: Certificate of Correction.

Full violation description from the source extract

FAILURE TO SUBMIT A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF VIOLATION #39069598M ISSUED ON 09-07-2022 FOR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BUILDING IN CODE-COMPLAINT MANNER., FILE A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

Issue date
September 4, 2026
Served date
September 4, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 263 — AC 28-204.4 FAIL TO COMPLY W/COMMISSIONER ORDER TO FILE CERT OF CORRECTION W/DOB
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning failure to submit a certificate of correction of violation #39069598m issued on 09-07-2022 for failure to maintain building in code-complaint manner., file a certificate of correction.

What this violation means

This summons alleges failure to comply with a prior Commissioner's order by filing an acceptable Certificate of Correction for an earlier summons. The underlying violation and the later compliance summons are separate records that should be tracked together.

What may be required to correct the condition

First identify the underlying summons referenced in the description and verify whether the physical condition was corrected, whether a Certificate of Correction was submitted, and its current DOB status. If correction is still outstanding, the underlying condition generally has to be addressed before an acceptable certification package can be completed.

What the OATH hearing may involve

The hearing may turn on the status of the underlying summons, the order to certify correction, the timing and adequacy of any submission, and whether DOB records show an accepted, rejected or missing Certificate of Correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Verify the underlying summons number, correction deadline/order, any prior Certificate of Correction request, disapproval reason, and whether later agency activity changed the status. Do not assume payment of an OATH penalty closed the DOB correction requirement.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • copy/status of the underlying summons
  • Certificate of Correction submission and DOB response
  • proof of physical correction such as photographs, receipts or permits
  • DOB NOW/BIS status records
  • OATH disposition and payment records if relevant
Violation 2

Summons 39559144J — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039559144J
OATH hearingNovember 19, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed, electrical wiring/equipment, lighting/illumination and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, electrical wiring/equipment, lighting/illumination, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT TIME OF INSPECTION, OBSERVED TEMPORARY LIGHTING OPERATING UNDER SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1. ELECTRICAL PERMIT M00323011-I1-EL EXPIRED ON 06/12/2026. TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT REMAINED IN USE UNDER AN E

Issue date
September 14, 2026
Served date
September 14, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 207 — BC 105.8.2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON SITE-EXPIRED PERMIT
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection OBSERVED TEMPORARY LIGHTING OPERATING UNDER SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1. ELECTRICAL PERMIT M00323011-I1-EL EXPIRED ON 06/12/2026. TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT REMAINED IN USE UNDER AN E.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation. Because electrical work is mentioned, any correction plan should separately verify whether licensed electrical work, filing or inspection is required.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 675 West 160 Street, Manhattan, NY 10032

For 675 West 160 Street, Manhattan, NY 10032, the current source extract points to certificate of correction / compliance filing, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages