November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

72-25 Park Drive East, Queens, NY 11367 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 4 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 72-25 Park Drive East, Queens, NY 11367. The source records identify dob/oath code-compliance issue, work not conforming to approved documents and a hearing date of November 10, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

DOB/OATH code-compliance issueWork not conforming to approved documents

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
72-25 Park Drive East, Queens, NY 11367
Borough
Queens
BIN
4142275
BBL
4065790021 (4/6579/21)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
4
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 10, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558350X
Normalized: 039558350X
November 10, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558351H
Normalized: 039558351H
November 10, 2026
10:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39558352J
Normalized: 039558352J
November 10, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue
39558353L
Normalized: 039558353L
November 10, 2026
9:30 AM
CLASS - 2 DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

How the summonses fit together at this property

This property has 4 separate summonses. Some can be coordinated as one property matter for research, correction planning and document gathering, but each summons remains tied to its own allegation and hearing information. The practical goal is to avoid solving only one piece of the property record while another summons or correction requirement remains open.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558350X — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558350X
OATH hearingNovember 10, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition. The inspector's description specifically references excavation.

Specific record details: excavation.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT INSPECTION OF A 2-STORY BUILDING AT EXCAVATION PHASE, A 10-FT-DEEP EXCAVATION WAS OBSERVED WITHOUT REQUIRED PROTECTION, PILING, OR LAGGING, CREATING A HAZARDOUS CONDITION AND POTENTIAL COLLAPSE RISK TO WORKE

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 110 — BC 3304.4,27-1032 FAIL TO PROVIDE PROTECTION AT SIDES OF EXCAVATION

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at inspection of a 2-story building at excavation phase, a 10-ft-deep excavation was observed without required protection, piling, or lagging, creating a hazardous condition and potential collapse risk to worke.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 2

Summons 39558351H — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558351H
OATH hearingNovember 10, 202610:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references excavation and exposure 2.

Specific record details: excavation, exposure 2.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT INSPECTION OF A PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING IN EXCAVATION, EXP# 2 WAS OBSERVED WITH A 10-FT-DEEP EXCAVATION LACKING REQUIRED PILING AND LAGGING. APPROVED SOE DRAWINGS REQUIRE PILING AND LAGGING AT THIS LOCATIO

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at inspection of a proposed 2-story building in excavation, exp# 2 was observed with a 10-ft-deep excavation lacking required piling and lagging. approved soe drawings require piling and lagging at this locatio.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 3

Summons 39558352J — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558352J
OATH hearingNovember 10, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition. The inspector's description specifically references railing/guard condition, excavation and exposure 1.

Specific record details: railing/guard condition, excavation, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT INSPECTION OF A PROPOSED 2-STORY BUILDING AT EXCAVATION, AN 8-FT-DEEP EXCAVATION WAS OBSERVED AT EXP# 1 WITHOUT A REQUIRED GUARDRAIL SYSTEM, CREATING A HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOR WORKERS AND PERSONS ENTERING TH

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 115 — BC 3301.2,27-1009(A) FAILURE TO INSTITUTE/MAINTAIN SAFETY EQUIPMENT MEASURES OR TEMPORARY

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at inspection of a proposed 2-story building at excavation, an 8-ft-deep excavation was observed at exp# 1 without a required guardrail system, creating a hazardous condition for workers and persons entering th.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Violation 4

Summons 39558353L — DOB/OATH code-compliance issue

Normalized lookup key: 039558353L
OATH hearingNovember 10, 20269:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a dob/oath code-compliance issue condition.

Record context: source category Unknown, severity CLASS - 2, issued August 25, 2026.

Full violation description from the source extract

3307.2.1 AT INSPECTION OF A PROPOSED TWO-STORY BUILDING, AN EXCAVATOR WAS OBSERVED ON SITE. UPON REQUEST, NO PERMIT FOR SIDEWALK CROSSING WITH HEAVY EQUIPMENT WAS PROVIDED OR AVAILABLE. THIS CONDITION CREATES A

Issue date
August 25, 2026
Served date
August 25, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2P7

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning 3307.2.1 at inspection of a proposed two-story building, an excavator was observed on site. upon request, no permit for sidewalk crossing with heavy equipment was provided or available. this condition creates a.

What this violation means

This summons is a DOB/OATH code-compliance matter. The source description—not the category label alone—should control the factual review, because similarly classified summonses can involve very different physical conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

Start by verifying the cited condition against the current site and DOB record, then identify the qualified contractor, licensed trade or registered design professional—if any—needed for correction, permits, inspection or closeout.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the facts alleged, the condition on the inspection date, permit/approval history, responsibility for the cited area, and any reliable evidence of correction or contrary facts.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the exact allegation, cited code section, location, permit/approval history and any later agency activity. Avoid assuming a defense or correction path before the current record is checked.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • the summons and current OATH status
  • dated photographs
  • relevant DOB permits/plans/violations
  • contracts, invoices or professional reports tied to the cited condition
  • proof of correction where available
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 72-25 Park Drive East, Queens, NY 11367

For 72-25 Park Drive East, Queens, NY 11367, the current source extract points to dob/oath code-compliance issue, work not conforming to approved documents. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.