November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

886 Faile Street, Bronx, NY 10474 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 4 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 886 Faile Street, Bronx, NY 10474. The source records identify occupancy / illegal conversion, electrical work without a permit, plumbing or gas work without a permit and a hearing date of November 27, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Occupancy / illegal conversionElectrical work without a permitPlumbing or gas work without a permitWork without a permit

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
886 Faile Street, Bronx, NY 10474
Borough
Bronx
BIN
2006356
BBL
2027610071 (2/2761/71)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
4
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 27, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39184727N
Normalized: 039184727N
November 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Occupancy / illegal conversion
39184728P
Normalized: 039184728P
November 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Electrical work without a permit
39184729R
Normalized: 039184729R
November 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 1 Plumbing or gas work without a permit
39184730Y
Normalized: 039184730Y
November 27, 2026
8:30 AM
CLASS - 2 Work without a permit

How the summonses fit together at this property

The summonses appear to describe different enforcement components of a broader alteration/occupancy issue: the record includes an occupancy or conversion allegation together with unpermitted construction or trade work. Several descriptions point to the same area (front), which is a sign the summonses may be factually connected. A coordinated review should compare the legal occupancy, plans and permit history before deciding whether restoration or legalization is practical, while keeping each summons's hearing date and evidence separate.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39184727N — Occupancy / illegal conversion

Normalized lookup key: 039184727N
OATH hearingNovember 27, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that the property's observed use or dwelling configuration did not match the legal occupancy shown in the cited DOB record. The inspector's description specifically references first floor, Class A residential occupancy, dwelling/occupancy configuration and apartment CREAT.

Specific record details: first floor, Class A residential occupancy, dwelling/occupancy configuration, apartment CREAT.

Full violation description from the source extract

CONTRARY TO DOB/OFFICIAL RECORDS WHICH INDICATES A 2 FAMILY, 2 STORY NFP DWELLING: AT TIME OF INSPECTION BUILDING WAS OBSERVED CREATED & OCCUPIED AS A 3 FAMILY DWELLING. 1ST FLR SUB-DIVIDED - CLASS 'A APT CREAT

Issue date
April 15, 2026
Served date
April 15, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 103 — 28-118.3.2 OCC CONTRARY TO THAT ALLOWED BY THE C OF O OR DOB RECORDS

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at the inspection BUILDING WAS OBSERVED CREATED & OCCUPIED AS A 3 FAMILY DWELLING. 1ST FLR SUB-DIVIDED - CLASS 'A APT CREAT.

What this violation means

This type of summons concerns use or occupancy that DOB says is inconsistent with the approved Certificate of Occupancy or other legal-use record. The central question is not just what rooms exist, but whether the present dwelling/use configuration is legally authorized.

What may be required to correct the condition

A practical correction review usually starts by comparing the current layout and use with the Certificate of Occupancy, approved plans, I-card/MDR or other historical records. Depending on what the records allow, the path may involve restoration to the approved use or a legalization filing if zoning, egress, fire-safety and building-code requirements can be met. The legal-use record should be obtained before deciding whether the present configuration can remain.

What the OATH hearing may involve

For the OATH matter, useful questions include what legal-use record DOB relied on, what the inspector actually observed, whether the cited space was occupied as alleged on the inspection date, and whether photographs, leases, plans or historical records support or contradict the stated occupancy.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Review the legal-use/occupancy history, the exact location cited, prior permits and alteration applications, and whether the source record accurately describes the number and type of dwelling units or the use of the cited space. Legalization should not be assumed until zoning and code feasibility are checked. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • Certificate of Occupancy or other legal-use record
  • approved plans and alteration applications
  • current photographs of the cited rooms/use
  • leases or occupancy records if relevant
  • prior permits, inspections and sign-offs
Violation 2

Summons 39184728P — Electrical work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039184728P
OATH hearingNovember 27, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that electrical wiring or equipment was installed without the required electrical permit or approval. The inspector's description specifically references first floor and electrical wiring/equipment.

Specific record details: first floor, electrical wiring/equipment.

Full violation description from the source extract

W/O A PERMIT. AT 1ST FLR - ELECTRICAL WIRING INSTALLED FOR ADDL'T LIGHTS, OUTLETS, SWITCHES., OBTAIN PERMIT

Issue date
April 15, 2026
Served date
April 15, 2026
Source violation type
Unknown
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 2C4 — 27-3018(B) ELECTRICAL WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning w/o a permit. at 1st floor - electrical wiring installed for addl't lights, outlets, switches.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that electrical work was installed without the required approval or permit. Electrical summonses often turn on both the physical wiring/equipment observed and whether a valid electrical filing or permit covered that scope.

What may be required to correct the condition

The permit history and current electrical condition should be checked first. If the wiring is to remain, a New York City licensed electrician may need to evaluate the work, obtain the appropriate electrical filing/permit where available, make any required corrections, and complete inspection or sign-off steps. If the work cannot remain, restoration/removal may be the alternative.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, evidence may include the electrical permit history, photographs showing the condition at the cited location, the scope of any existing permit, invoices or contractor records, and proof of correction if work was later legalized or removed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Confirm whether the cited wiring/equipment was actually new work, whether it fell within an existing electrical filing, whether the location and scope in the summons match the site, and whether subsequent permitted correction changes the evidentiary picture.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • electrical permits/filings and inspection records
  • photographs of the cited wiring or equipment
  • licensed-electrician invoices or reports
  • approved construction plans if the electrical scope is part of a larger alteration
  • proof of correction and any Certificate of Correction submission
Violation 3

Summons 39184729R — Plumbing or gas work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039184729R
OATH hearingNovember 27, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that plumbing and/or gas work was installed without the required permit. The inspector's description specifically references cellar, front area, first floor, bathroom fixtures, kitchen, stove and gas piping.

Specific record details: cellar, front area, first floor, bathroom fixtures, kitchen, stove, gas piping.

Full violation description from the source extract

W/O A PERMIT. NOTED: WATER & WASTE LINES INSTALLED AT 1ST FLR FOR ADDL'T 3 PC BTHRM; RESIDENTIAL SINK AT FRONT APT KITCHEN. GAS LINE INSTALLED FOR ADDL'T STOVE. AT CELLAR WATER & WASTE LINES INSTALLED FOR 3 PC

Issue date
April 15, 2026
Served date
April 15, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 1
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 101 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning water & waste lines installed at 1st floor for addl't 3 pc bthrm; residential sink at front apt kitchen. gas line installed for addl't stove. at cellar water & waste lines installed for 3 pc.

What this violation means

This summons concerns plumbing and/or gas work that DOB says was installed without the required permit. The cited fixtures, water/waste piping or gas piping should be compared with the legal plans and permit history.

What may be required to correct the condition

Depending on the condition, a New York City licensed master plumber and, where design work is involved, a registered design professional may need to determine whether the installation can be legalized or must be removed/restored. Permits, pressure/testing requirements, inspections and closeout may apply.

What the OATH hearing may involve

For the hearing, records showing whether the plumbing/gas scope was permitted, when it was installed, who performed it, and whether the cited fixtures or lines existed as described can be important. Correction evidence does not automatically resolve every hearing issue, but it can be relevant.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Check existing plumbing/gas permits, approved plans, the exact fixtures and piping described, and whether the cited work is part of a broader occupancy or conversion condition. If gas piping is involved, do not assume it can remain without licensed review. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • plumbing/gas permits and approved plans
  • licensed-plumber records, invoices or test documentation
  • photographs of the cited fixtures and piping
  • inspection/sign-off records
  • proof of correction and Certificate of Correction materials where applicable
Violation 4

Summons 39184730Y — Work without a permit

Normalized lookup key: 039184730Y
OATH hearingNovember 27, 20268:30 AM

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that construction or alteration work was performed without the required permit. The inspector's description specifically references rear area, front area, first floor, partition walls, bedroom(s) and bathroom fixtures.

Specific record details: rear area, front area, first floor, partition walls, bedroom(s), bathroom fixtures.

Full violation description from the source extract

W/O A PERMIT. NOTED: AT 1ST FLR - FULL HEIGHT PARTITION WALLS ERECTED TO SUB-DIVIDE LEVEL FRONT & REAR, CHANGE FLR LAYOUT; AND TO CREATE AN ADDL'T BTHRM & BDRM., OBTAIN ALL PERMITS

Issue date
April 15, 2026
Served date
April 15, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 201 — 28-105.1 WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning at 1st floor - full height partition walls erected to sub-divide level front & rear, change floor layout; and to create an addl't bthrm & bdrm.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that construction or alteration work occurred without the permit required for that scope. The key resolution question is whether the current condition can be legalized, is already covered by an existing approval, or must be restored/removed.

What may be required to correct the condition

Research the permit and approved-plan history before choosing a cure. If the work can legally remain, a registered architect or professional engineer may need to prepare or amend drawings and coordinate permits; licensed trades may be required for regulated work. If legalization is not viable, restoration to an approved condition may be the faster path.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing preparation should focus on the actual scope observed, the permit record in effect on the inspection date, whether the cited work matches an approved filing, who was responsible for the work, and any photographs or records showing the condition before or after correction.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Compare the inspector's description to the approved plans and permit scope, determine when the work was performed, and verify whether the work was exempt, previously approved, or later legalized. None of those possibilities should be assumed without records. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB permit/application history
  • approved plans and amendments
  • photographs of the cited work
  • contracts, invoices and contractor records
  • proof of restoration/legalization and any inspection or sign-off records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 886 Faile Street, Bronx, NY 10474

For 886 Faile Street, Bronx, NY 10474, the current source extract points to occupancy / illegal conversion, electrical work without a permit, plumbing or gas work without a permit. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.