(866) 545-4440 [email protected] New York City · OATH Hearings · November 2026
BUILDING VIOLATION™A service of Building Violation LLC · Code Compliance
November 2026 NYC DOB / ECB / OATH public-record review

94 Macon Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216 — November 2026 NYC OATH Hearing & Violation Information

The resolved public-record dataset associates 2 DOB/ECB OATH summonses with 94 Macon Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216. The source records identify work not conforming to approved documents, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection and a hearing date of November 4, 2026. The sections below keep the source allegations separate from explanatory analysis so an owner, buyer, realtor, attorney, lender, property manager or contractor can see what the record says, what still needs verification, and what a practical next review could involve.

Work not conforming to approved documentsSidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Property and hearing summary

Actual property address
94 Macon Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216
Borough
Brooklyn
BIN
3053271
BBL
3018500015 (3/1850/15)
Hearing month
November 2026
Violations on this page
2
Verified hearing date(s) in source extract
November 4, 2026
Source extract
September 18, 2026
Source information: This page was compiled from NYC DOB/ECB/OATH public-record information contained in the November 2026 resolved-property dataset and the associated DOB/ECB source extract dated September 18, 2026. Agency records may change after the source data was obtained. Hearing dates, status, penalties, correction status and agency records should be verified with NYC OATH and DOB before relying on this page.

November 2026 hearing summary

ECB/OATH summonsHearing date / timeSeverityRecord category
39558576Z
Normalized: 039558576Z		 November 4, 2026
10:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Work not conforming to approved documents
39558577K
Normalized: 039558577K		 November 4, 2026
8:30 AM		 CLASS - 2 Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

How the summonses fit together at this property

These summonses form a construction-site compliance cluster rather than a single generic violation. They address different safety, temporary-protection, approved-plan or work-control obligations at the same property. Several descriptions point to the same area (sidewalk shed), which is a sign the summonses may be factually connected. Site records should be organized by inspection date and cited condition so the correction and hearing response for one summons is not mistakenly used for another.

Violation-by-violation record and analysis

Each section first identifies what comes directly from the source extract, then separates general explanatory and strategic considerations that may require current-record research or professional review.

Violation 1

Summons 39558576Z — Work not conforming to approved documents

Normalized lookup key: 039558576Z
OATH hearingNovember 4, 202610:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges that field work did not conform to the approved construction documents. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION ON AN ACTIVE JOB SITE, I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1 AND WAS NOT CONFORM TO PLANS AS PER PLANS EQ- -102.00 PAGE 2 SHOW THAT CROSS BRACING BETWEEN VERTICAL MEMBERS SHALL BE

Issue date
August 31, 2026
Served date
August 31, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 282 — 28-105.12.2 WRK DOESN'T CONFORM TO APPROV DOCS AND/OR APPROV AMENDMENTS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1 AND WAS NOT CONFORM TO PLANS AS PER PLANS EQ- -102.00 PAGE 2 SHOW THAT CROSS BRACING BETWEEN VERTICAL MEMBERS SHALL BE.

What this violation means

DOB is alleging that work in progress did not match the approved construction documents or amendments. Even permitted work can be cited if the field condition departs materially from the approved plan set.

What may be required to correct the condition

The field condition should be compared line-by-line with the approved plans. Depending on what is found, the project may need to be restored to the approved design or the plans may need to be amended and re-approved before the work continues or is signed off.

What the OATH hearing may involve

Hearing evidence can include the approved plan sheets in effect on the inspection date, revision history, photographs of the field condition, professional reports and proof that the discrepancy was corrected or formally amended.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Identify the exact plan sheet/detail DOB says was violated, confirm which approved set controlled on the inspection date, and determine whether the field condition was temporary, incomplete, or actually inconsistent with the approval.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • DOB-approved construction documents and amendments
  • field photographs
  • architect/engineer field reports
  • permit and inspection history
  • revised approvals or restoration evidence
Violation 2

Summons 39558577K — Sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection

Normalized lookup key: 039558577K
OATH hearingNovember 4, 20268:30 AM
Source-record facts

What DOB alleges

DOB alleges a defect or code-compliance problem involving sidewalk-shed/scaffold protection. The inspector's description specifically references sidewalk shed, scaffold/shoring and exposure 1.

Specific record details: sidewalk shed, scaffold/shoring, exposure 1.

Full violation description from the source extract

AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION ON AN ACTIVE JOB SITE , I OBSERVED SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1 AND ON TOP OF SHED WAS CONSISTING OF SCAFFOLD PARTS AND NETTING AS PER BC 3307.6.4.2.2 PLANS DID NOT SHOW A DESIGNATED AR

Issue date
August 31, 2026
Served date
August 31, 2026
Source violation type
Construction
Severity
CLASS - 2
Hearing status in source extract
PENDING
Infraction / law references in source extract:
  • 223 — BC 3307.6,27-1021 SIDEWALK SHED DOES NOT MEET CODE SPECIFICATIONS
General explanation / matters to verify

Record-specific focus: Before choosing a correction or hearing strategy, verify the source allegation concerning observed SIDEWALK SHED AT EXPOSURE 1 AND ON TOP OF SHED WAS CONSISTING OF SCAFFOLD PARTS AND NETTING AS PER BC 3307.6.4.2.2 PLANS DID NOT SHOW A DESIGNATED AR.

What this violation means

The allegation concerns a sidewalk shed, scaffold, overhead protection or related temporary construction protection that DOB says did not meet required safety or maintenance conditions.

What may be required to correct the condition

The cited shed/scaffold condition should be inspected against the approved temporary-construction documents and Chapter 33 requirements. Correction may involve immediate repair, lighting, edge protection, anchorage, dimensions, housekeeping or permit/document updates depending on the allegation.

What the OATH hearing may involve

At OATH, dated site photographs, the approved shed/scaffold drawings or permit, inspection logs, contractor records and proof of prompt correction can help establish what condition existed and how it was addressed.

Possible defenses or factual issues worth investigating

Match the inspector's cited location and component to the approved temporary-construction setup, determine whether the condition was transient or ongoing, and verify permit/status information for the protection system. Because the description identifies several physical components or locations, photographs and records should be matched to those specific details rather than submitted as general property evidence.

Documents and evidence that may be useful

  • sidewalk-shed/scaffold permit and approved drawings
  • site photographs from the inspection period
  • daily/site-safety inspection logs
  • contractor repair records
  • DOB inspection/reinspection records
Property-specific resolution support

How Building Violation LLC may help at 94 Macon Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216

For 94 Macon Street, Brooklyn, NY 11216, the current source extract points to work not conforming to approved documents, sidewalk shed / temporary construction protection. Because this property has multiple summonses, the practical advantage is coordinating record research, hearing preparation and correction work as one property matter while still tracking each summons separately. Building Violation LLC can scope the relevant record research, OATH hearing preparation/representation, permit or legal-use review, licensed-trade or registered-professional coordination, correction documentation and Certificate of Correction/closeout work where those steps actually apply. Detailed technical research and project work begin only after the applicable scope, authorization and payment are established.

Violation and property-record research OATH / ECB hearing preparation and representation
Start Property Review Call (866) 545-4440 [email protected]
Official government starting points

Verify the current OATH / DOB record

The source extract is a point-in-time record. Hearing dates, hearing status, penalties, correction status, permits and later agency filings can change. Use the official NYC systems below before making a decision or appearing at a hearing.

General information / not legal advice: The explanatory and procedural information on this page is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Property-specific defenses, filing requirements and correction strategies should be verified based on the current agency record and the circumstances of the matter.

Browse all resolved November 2026 property hearing pages